AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Baishali Maiti

MATH121 · MATH34 · MATH034 · MATH990 · MATH30 · MATH120 · MATH075 · MATH110 · MATH119 · MATH055 · MATH135 · MATH182 · MATH75 · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
19.05%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you already have strong math skills and can learn independently.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerFast lecturesSelf-teaching requiredTest heavyMixed by eraLow flexibility
  • Recent reviews are strongly negative, with students , and require self-teaching.
  • Older reviews are more positive, especially for lower-level and helpful support.
  • Grades can be attainable for prepared students, but , and high dropout pressure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some older reviews say an A is possible with attendance and homework, but , and major self-teaching.

Online reviews make the A look hard, while and recent severe complaints.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The math content becomes challenging because , and students often feel forced to teach themselves.

Both formats cite fast or .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Many reviews say lectures are required, attendance matters, or unhelpful.

Online evidence says required lectures are pointless, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Recent because , and frustrating for anyone who needs guidance.

Online reviews are consistently negative, while but have a strong recent negative trend.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Reviews mention tough grading, test-heavy structure, no in some classes, and few graded .

Format shift

and overload, while in-person reviews include both strict recent reports and older fair-grading comments.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students describe lots of , and overload in tougher courses.

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly call the work an overload, while in-person reviews vary by course but often mention lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Poor

31/100

Recent reviews often describe fast, , skipped steps, mistakes, annoyance at questions, and a .

Format shift

Online teaching is rated especially poorly, while severe recent criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Many comments describe tests, quizzes, finals, few graded items, and as central to the class.

Format shift

Both formats mention exams heavily, with weight.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed over time, but recent comments are harsh about rushed , and self-teaching.

Main concern

The main concern is fast, unclear instruction that weak students may not survive.

What students said

“People with math not their strong suit, literally just gonna have to teach yourself.”
MATH182
“Goes through the material .”
MATH121
“she goes over each topic in an in-depth and well-structred fashion.”
MATH121

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are very negative, emphasizing required but , and poor communication.

Main concern

Students say and low flexibility.

What students said

“Basically, you will be teaching yourself Calculus which is ridiculous.”
MATH182
“The lectures are required and are pointless because you won't learn anything from them.”
MATH182
“I worked hard in this class but it was an overload.”
MATH182

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe exam-heavy grading with hard or tightly scheduled tests, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Test HeavyFew Graded ItemsTimed TestsNo Extra Credit In Some SectionsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe test-heavy grading, few graded items, no in some sections, and strict test timing, but .

Test HeavyFew Graded ItemsTimed TestsNo Extra Credit In Some Sections
“74% OF !”
MATH034
“ and makes them due at 10-11am”
MATH182

Online

Online reviews , and overload, but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or proctoring rules.

Hard ExamsHeavy HomeworkNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“The and even if you had the whole semester to complete the hw it was still a lot.”
MATH182
“The lectures are required and are pointless because you won't learn anything from them.”
MATH182

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Basically, you will be teaching yourself Calculus which is ridiculous.”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

31/100

“ and expects us to know.”

📈 Difficulty & Grades

35/100

“The whole class depends on test and no !”

👍 Recommendation Rate

24/100

“if u are not .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Goes through the material .
  • She teaches extremely fast.
  • She skips steps while teaching the process "because you all know this right?".

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • 74% OF !
  • The if you do the HW.
  • The and even if you had the whole semester to complete the hw it was still a lot.

Theme 3

🚨 About Fit For Students

  • People with math not their strong suit, literally just gonna have to teach yourself.
  • If you struggle with math she is the !!
  • As a full time student with a job, .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-eight reviews across many years give detailed evidence, though older positive reviews conflict with recent negative ones.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 58
1 out of 513

Course coverage

MATH1209 reviews
MATH1828 reviews
MATH1355 reviews
MATH1214 reviews
MATH1102 reviews
Show 10 more courses
751 review
951 review
MATH0341 review
MATH0551 review
MATH0751 review
MATH1191 review
MATH301 review
MATH341 review
MATH751 review
MATH9901 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

12

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 8 · Rather not say 1