AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rachael Webster

MATH124 · MATH40 · MATH142 · MATH194 · MATH294 · COM124 · MATH181 · MATH192 · MATH125 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
30.77%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid her unless and and heavy stress.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesHeavy homeworkTough gradingSelf-study requiredInconsistent grading
  • and weak feedback.
  • Students often report heavy or , and tests.
  • A small cluster says and , but this is not the dominant experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some students got A , but most describe a stressful path with confusing teaching and tough grading.

Online evidence mentions easy quizzes and tests in MATH194, while and many reports of .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The math content is made harder by unclear lectures, poor alignment between practice and exams, and .

Online students often had to read the book independently, while and mismatched exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some reviews say missing class is allowed or not marked down, but and participation matter for passing.

In-person reviews provide most attendance evidence, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

23/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and heavy stress.

Both online and , though a minority of in-person MATH142 reviews are positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

as tough, late, inconsistent, or based on too few items, despite some and easy tests.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize tough or delayed grading, while about strict and inconsistent grading.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students frequently mention lots of , and test preparation, sometimes with poor guidance.

Format shift

Online students report heavy homework and self-study, while and occasional lack of useful practice.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

and weak support, with only a small positive cluster praising clarity and flexibility.

Format shift

Online reviews are mostly negative about teaching and communication, while but still dominated by complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grades , and a few graded items, with homework and varying by course.

Format shift

Both formats mention tests and quizzes often, while and group work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are sharply mixed but mostly negative, with , and late grades.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say lectures do not prepare them for .

What students said

“ and .”
MATH40
“Personally, unless youre good at math or can .”
MATH142
“Everything I learned was from textbook.”
MATH294

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with students reporting rude , and self-study.

Main concern

Students say online instruction often requires learning from the book with little useful teaching.

What students said

“She does not teach or grade anything.”
MATH125
“The good part of this class is That tests and ”
MATH194
“ .”
COM124

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

tests easy and many others saying exams are hard, poorly aligned, or based on few grades.

Easy Quizzes In Some Online ReviewsHard Tests In Many In-Person ReviewsFew Graded ItemsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews often describe hard or poorly aligned tests, though a .

Hard TestsPoor Exam AlignmentExtra Credit In Some Courses
“No study guides for semester tests r very hard”
MATH40
“ .”
MATH294

Online

Online reviews mention easy quizzes and tests in MATH194 but also tough grading and or open-book policy.

Easy Quizzes In Some ReviewsTest HeavyNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“quizzes and ”
MATH194
“she also gives a bunch of and tests”
MATH125

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and recommendation tone. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“ and .”

⚖️

30/100

“All over the place when deciding to give credit or not.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“She will give you close to 200 problems to do in 1 week before a test.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She rarely deals with example problems, and
  • She made tons of mistakes and is very .
  • I love the way she lectures because it is so clear.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • everything you do in the textbook is .
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • Very underprepared and .
  • 4 yrs there.
  • but she makes the class pretty easy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 39 reviews across multiple years and courses, with repeated themes despite some mixed positive clusters.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 524

Course coverage

MATH14215 reviews
MATH1246 reviews
MATH1945 reviews
MATH2945 reviews
MATH1253 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH402 reviews
COM1241 review
MATH1811 review
MATH1921 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 7

B range

8

B+ 3 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

5

C+ 3 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 6