AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Olesia Parasiuk-Zasun

MATH121 · MATH1939295 · MATH9028 · MATH191 · MTH53 · MATH53 · MATH292 · MATH192 · MATH193 · MATH183 · MATH135 · MATH114 · 49 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
55.1%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take her if you are willing to work consistently and ask for help, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but polarizingHeavy homeworkExtra credit availableLecture heavyTest focused
  • Students and confusing, disorganized lectures.
  • Getting an A is possible with , and , but it usually requires steady effort.
  • Exams and quizzes matter heavily, while homework and often help offset the difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic because of , practice problems, and occasional lenient grading, but students repeatedly say it requires hard work and .

Online reviews include both Easy A claims and stressful workload complaints, while as earned through consistent effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The math content is not described as easy, and feel harder than it needs to be.

Online students mention self-study and tech issues, while and fast or cluttered explanations.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Attendance , but , and exam preparation make showing up important.

Online reviews sometimes mention flexible support, while passing difficult.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

57/100

Students recommend her when they value caring support and , but many warn against her because of confusing teaching and .

Online recommendation is especially split, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grading ranges from strict and occasional rounding, so fairness depends heavily on the course and term.

Format shift

Online reviews include rounding and , while and tough grader complaints.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Many students report lots of , and test preparation, even when the grading offers .

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy homework, with online summer sections sounding especially intense.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She is widely described as caring and helpful, but a large share of students say lectures are confusing, unorganized, or .

Format shift

Online reviews add technology and self-study concerns, while and organization.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades are driven heavily by quizzes, exams, midterms, and and serving as support.

Format shift

Both formats are test focused, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a caring professor with and exam preparation, but also repeated complaints , and heavy homework.

Main concern

The .

What students said

“Had to work very hard for an A but it is definitely doable for anyone.”
MATH193
“Her grading policies were very strict, its as if she tries her hardest to find mistakes so .”
MATH121
“She always gave us a notecard for tests and a whole piece of .”
MATH193

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with some students praising flexibility and recorded support while others describe and .

Main concern

Online students and .

What students said

“ .”
MATH191
“Easy A is you participate and .”
MATH135
“Never had time to go over all material nor learn much in class.”
MATH193

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are central and sometimes difficult, but notecards, practice problems, and make them more manageable.

Notecards AllowedPractice Problems Similar To ExamsTest HeavyIn-Person Tests For Some Online Classes

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a simple final in some sections, but do not clearly prove closed-book exams or proctoring rules.

Notecards AllowedPractice TestsQuizzes And ExamsSimple Final In Some Sections
“She always gave us a notecard for tests and a whole piece of .”
MATH193
“She gives practice tests that are similiar to the real tests.”
MATH193
“The and hw problems.”
MATH193

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention online quizzes, double-sided notecards, and , but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book exams.

Online QuizzesDouble-Sided NotecardsIn-Person Campus Tests
“ and use double-sided notecards for her tests”
MATH191
“ .”
MATH191
“Her quizzes and and you need to study for them.”
MATH193

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Had to work very hard for an A but it is definitely doable for anyone.”

Voice snapshots generated from 49 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“She is a very nice teacher and wants to see students succeed.”

📈 Effort For Grades

58/100

“Had to work very hard for an A but it is definitely doable for anyone.”

⚠️ Lecture Risk

42/100

“ and unorganized.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and unorganized.
  • and clear.
  • She taught us as if it were review, and expected us to know all the material beforehand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • if you use the DVC ASC for math hours.
  • Had to work very hard for an A but it is definitely doable for anyone.
  • Her grading policies were very strict, its as if she tries her hardest to find mistakes so .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She is a very nice teacher and wants to see students succeed.
  • and .
  • If you pay attention to the lectures and ask for help you'll do well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

49

Recent reviews read by the AI

49

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 49 reviews across many years and courses, with , and mixed lecture quality.

Inside 49 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 57
3 out of 54
2 out of 57
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH19320 reviews
MATH1919 reviews
MATH1215 reviews
MATH1924 reviews
MATH1352 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH2922 reviews
MATH532 reviews
MATH1141 review
MATH1831 review
MATH19392951 review
MATH90281 review
MTH531 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

37 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 2 · A 13

B range

10

B+ 1 · B 8 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 2