AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lindsey Wylie

MATH192 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

She is a strong choice for students who want a caring math professor with helpful notes and manageable work.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringHelpful notesStudent-friendly homeworkClear supportExam-based grading
  • Students consistently describe Wylie as caring, supportive, and focused on student success.
  • and forgiving, including infinite tries in one review.
  • , but students still describe the class as manageable and well supported.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

The class is not a free A because exams matter, but , and caring support make a high grade very reachable.

Online evidence comes from one A review praising recorded lectures, while and but also test-based grading.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Students , and a professor who makes sure they understand the material.

Online evidence emphasizes flexible recorded lectures, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

72/100

Attendance appears useful for success, but the online review supports flexible recorded lectures and .

Online evidence is more flexible because lectures are recorded, while in-person reviews imply showing up helps but .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

and highlights her care, helpful notes, and student-centered support.

Both formats are positive, though the online sample is only one review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

and make grading student-friendly, though exams still carry major weight.

Format shift

, while the online review only confirms a successful A experience.

Workload

Light

80/100

Workload appears manageable because notes are provided, , and students do not describe excessive assignments.

Format shift

Online workload looks flexible through recorded lectures, while and structured notes.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

All reviews describe her as caring, supportive, prepared, and focused on helping students understand math.

Format shift

Both formats praise her support, with online evidence highlighting recorded lectures and in-person evidence highlighting notes and care.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews mention three or the class grade is mostly test score.

Format shift

, while the online review does not describe assessment details.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews praise her care, prepared notes, easy homework, and , while noting that .

Main concern

The main risk is that the .

What students said

“No reason to fail her class.”
MATH-192
“The and allows infinite tries to get 100%.”
MATH-192
“grade in class = test score.”
MATH-192

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The , and recorded lectures that can be watched anytime.

Main concern

The online evidence is positive but limited to one review.

What students said

“she records her lectures so you can watch them whenever works for you.”
MATH-192

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course is exam focused, but reviews do not describe strict proctoring, closed-book rules, or open-book rules clearly.

Three TestsFinal ExamModule ExamsExtra Credit On Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly mention multiple tests, a final, and , but do not clearly prove proctoring or book rules.

Three TestsFinal ExamModule ExamsExtra Credit On Tests
“3 Tests. 1 Final.”
MATH-192
“ but have opportunity at the end.”
MATH-192
“4 module exams (60% of grade) cumulative final (30%)”
MATH-192

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove exam .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No reason to fail her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and ; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“she really cares.”

📈 Grade Path

86/100

“The and allows infinite tries to get 100%.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“No reason to fail her class.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support

  • she really cares.
  • Professor Wylie is very nice and caring.
  • you could tell she cares about her student's success.

Theme 2

📝 About Notes And Lectures

  • She makes the notes for you (via. google drive).
  • she records her lectures so you can watch them whenever works for you.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • The and allows infinite tries to get 100%.
  • but have opportunity at the end.
  • grade in class = test score.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

46/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews are available, so the tone is very positive but the evidence base is small.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH-1923 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values