AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rostislav Smirnoff

MATH110 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and do not need steady support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing teachingTest heavyClear grading criteriaBasic math support risk
  • Reviews are highly split, with two very negative experiences and one strong positive comment.
  • The online review is only a , so online evidence is weak and negative.
  • In-person comments conflict sharply on whether he teaches clearly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The only grade reported is an Incomplete, and the .

Online evidence is a drop, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course appears basic math, but comments suggest teaching quality can make it feel harder.

Online evidence is too vague, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Despite one positive review, the stronger pattern includes dropping and .

Online evidence is negative, while and strong praise.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

and test-heavy tags appear, but there is no strong evidence of .

Format shift

but no completed grade, while .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Format shift

Online mentions tests and few graded items, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Teaching feedback is polarized, but two of .

Format shift

Online evidence is a drop, while in-person reviews range from .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

The online tags describe the class as test heavy and graded by few things.

Format shift

, while in-person evidence is silent.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are sharply polarized between very poor teaching and .

Main concern

Teaching quality is inconsistent across the small sample.

What students said

“A very poor math teacher. .”
MATH110
“He's very straight to the point and he teaches you the easiest ways to solve the equations.”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online student dropped and left no useful positive learning evidence.

Main concern

Dropping the course is the main online signal.

What students said

“I lowkey no cap on god dropped”
MATH110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show a test-heavy structure but do .

Test HeavyFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

The but does not clearly prove proctoring or .

Test HeavyFew Graded Items
“I lowkey no cap on god dropped”
MATH110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A very poor math teacher. . He should not be teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting teaching quality and course outcome. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“A very poor math teacher. . He should not be teaching.”

⚖️ Mixed Clarity

45/100

“He's very straight to the point and he teaches you the easiest ways to solve the equations.”

⚠️ Online Risk

35/100

“I lowkey no cap on god dropped”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • A very poor math teacher. .
  • He's very straight to the point and he teaches you the easiest ways to solve the equations.

Theme 2

📉 About Course Outcome

  • I lowkey no cap on god dropped
  • He should not be teaching.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

, and the comments conflict sharply.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1103 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1