AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Claudia Abadia

MATH203 · MATH142 · MATH122 · MATH120 · MATH201 · MATH192 · MATH110 · MATH075 · MATH135 · MATH75 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Only take her if and , because many students criticize the lecture quality and classroom experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProVague lecturesLenient gradingHeavy homeworkEasy testsMixed personality
  • Recent reviews are mostly negative, citing vague lectures, poor pacing, tangents, and uncomfortable classroom interactions.
  • scores, partial credit, makeups, and homework helping grades.
  • Older reviews are much more positive, but the current pattern suggests .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Grades can be attainable because and she drops scores or gives partial credit, but and self-study.

Online A reviews credit Pearson and self-teaching, while and lenient policies but uneven instruction.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The math content is not always hard, but poor pacing, vague explanations, and .

Online reviews say Pearson makes the course manageable, while in-person reviews vary from easy to requiring 20 hours a week.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Attendance seems useful or expected because many comments focus on lectures and in-class participation, but .

In-person reviews mention participation and going to every class, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

because lectures are vague, pacing is poor, and many feel they must teach themselves.

Online and recent in-person reviews are mostly negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Students mention partial credit, dropped scores, makeups, easy tests, and .

Format shift

Both formats show grade-friendly elements, with online students crediting Pearson and and leniency.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

as significant, especially Pearson work and calculus preparation requiring major study time.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize Pearson taking a lot of time, while in-person reviews range from manageable homework to 20 hours a week.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Many reviews criticize vague lectures, poor pacing, tangents, complaints, and discouraging interactions, despite some older praise.

Format shift

Online reviews mostly describe weak teaching or reliance on Pearson, while but recently negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades , and participation rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention Pearson homework and three exams, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

recent complaints about pacing and vague lectures but older praise for patience and clarity.

Main concern

Students often report unclear lectures, poor pacing, tangents, or feeling discouraged when asking questions.

What students said

“ , and some material wasn't covered in class.”
MATH192
“Her lectures were vague and I felt stupid when trying to ask questions about the lecture.”
MATH135

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but suggest Pearson can help students earn grades while her own lectures and communication are weak.

Main concern

Students may need YouTube, Pearson, or independent study because lectures and communication are not reliable.

What students said

“Just replace her lectures with what you find on YT”
MATH142
“ . Bad attitude.Does not teach at all for hybrid class”
MATH203

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally described as fair or easy, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book policies.

Three ExamsEasy TestsStudy GuideExam MakeupsPartial Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

63/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention easy tests, study guides, makeups, and partial credit, but .

Easy TestsStudy GuideExam MakeupsPartial Credit
“ .”
MATH142
“she gives you a study guide that basically outlines the test.”
MATH142

Online

Online reviews mention three fair exams but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Three ExamsFair Exams
“the 3 exams were fair”
MATH142

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just replace her lectures with what you find on YT, do the hw, and you'll be fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and self-teaching risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Her lectures were vague and I felt stupid when trying to ask questions about the lecture.”

⚖️

70/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Balance

35/100

“Only way to pass the class is to spend 20hrs a week dedicated to studying if you haven't taken calculus before.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • vague lectures and class had no energy whatsoever.
  • She's patient and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and she gives you a study guide that basically outlines the test.
  • She uses Pearson which is probably the main reason I got an A.
  • hw.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • complains a bit too much when class isnt going right also talks too fast.
  • You will be asked to participate yet be too afraid to ask for help
  • Don't say negative comments, talk to us with respect

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-five reviews over a long span provide rich evidence, though older positive reviews conflict with more recent negative ones.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 56
2 out of 56
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH1426 reviews
MATH1926 reviews
MATH1354 reviews
MATH0752 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH1101 review
MATH1221 review
MATH2011 review
MATH2031 review
MATH751 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 4 · A- 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1