AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Scott Glenn

MATH192193292 · MATH292 · MATH192 · MATH90 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take Scott Glenn if you want a supportive and office-hour effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring mentorClear examsHelpful office hoursWeekly homeworkStrong lecturer
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Glenn as , and clear.
  • and predictable, .
  • Math still requires steady weekly work, especially in calculus courses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is realistic with , and office-hour effort, but the math is not effortless.

Online and , while online mentions no and in-person stresses attendance and homework.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The courses are real math classes with theoretical or calculus content, but .

Online evidence covers multiple math courses, while and lower-level math with similar support.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but students say showing up is important for success.

, while the online review does not define an .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and fair with exams.

Both online and from the six in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

because exams reflect homework and he may round grades, though there is no online.

Format shift

In-person reviews mention rounding and straightforward exams, while the online review says there is no .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload is steady rather than light, with and multiple exams in math courses.

Format shift

Both formats mention homework, and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students repeatedly praise his clarity, patience, accessibility, organization, and care for student success.

Format shift

Both formats praise his support, with .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment appears built around exams and .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions weekly homework and 24-hour or in-class exams, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person , and straightforward exams.

Main concern

Students still need to attend, ask questions, and .

What students said

“His exams are super straight ”
MATH292
“If you can't understand the material after he presents it he will reexplain it in a way that you can understand it.”
MATH90
“Show up to class, ask questions, and do the .”
MATH192

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review is highly positive and , and exams that may be 24-hour or in class.

Main concern

There is and no .

What students said

“Took him for 3 semesters online and is my favourite professor of all time!”
MATH192193292
“ or in class.”
MATH192193292

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally student-friendly because they are predictable and , though reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Straightforward ExamsHomework-Based Exams24-Hour Exams PossibleNo Extra Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe , but do not clearly prove book rules or proctoring.

Straightforward ExamsHomework-Based ExamsPredictable Exams
“His exams are super straight ”
MATH292
“ what to expect.”
MATH192

Online

The online review says exams are either 24-hour or in class, but does not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or camera requirements.

24-Hour Exams PossibleIn-Class Exams PossibleNo Extra Credit
“ or in class.”
MATH192193292
“No .”
MATH192193292

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Scott was the best!! I was doing poorly at the beginning of the semester, but by going to office hours regularly, he was able to catch me up and help me learn all the new concepts.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“If you can't understand the material after he presents it he will reexplain it in a way that you can understand it.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

91/100

“Took him for 3 semesters online and is my favourite professor of all time!”

⚖️

82/100

“ what to expect.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • An absolutely wonderful lecturer, I had him for 2 semesters of calculus classes, and I wish he taught the next section of math I had.
  • .
  • He wants his students to do well, he really cares for them.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Calc 3 material isn't as bad compared to Calc 2 but be ready to grind!
  • Show up to class, ask questions, and do the .
  • During the course, around 4 exams were assigned and usually around 2 assignments of next week.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • His exams are super straight
  • or in class.
  • what to expect.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because seven detailed reviews are highly consistent, though the online sample has only one review.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1923 reviews
MATH2922 reviews
MATH1921932921 review
MATH901 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1