AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ronald Page

MATH142 · MATH135 · MATH075 · MATH75 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

, but be cautious with MATH142 because recent reviews report weak instruction and heavy group work.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear Math ExplanationsPatient and CaringHeavy HomeworkGroup Work IssuesTest Heavy
  • Many older .
  • Recent MATH142 reviews describe poor teaching, heavy group work, and .
  • He fits students who want guided math help better than students avoiding workload or group learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is possible with practice and help, but , and stressful recent courses keep it from being easy.

Online evidence is negative and test-focused, while foundational courses and heavy workload in harder ones.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Foundational courses can feel manageable with , but MATH142 and some remedial sections are described as stressful and hard.

The online review describes a difficult group-work class, while in-person reviews range from beginner-friendly to very challenging.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though some mention students leaving or not showing up.

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

but warn against recent group-based and test-heavy sections.

Online evidence is not recommended, while positives and several recent negatives.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and clear criteria appear in some reviews, but hard tests and .

Format shift

Online grading appears less supportive, while reviews.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Multiple reviews mention lots of , and test-heavy structure.

Format shift

Both online and MATH142.

Teaching experience

Average

66/100

His teaching is praised as clear and caring in many older reviews, but recent reviews criticize him for making students teach themselves.

Format shift

Online evidence is poor, while but inconsistent across courses and years.

Assessment method

Balanced

61/100

, and tests, with several comments describing the class as test heavy.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes group work and tests, while , and group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are split between strong praise for and recent complaints about difficult, self-taught group-based classes.

Main concern

The experience depends heavily on course and structure, especially in MATH142.

What students said

“His and he is good at breaking down difficult topics.”
MATH135
“All he does it puts you in groups and makes you teach yourself all the work/units.”
MATH142
“Home work every day but so practice is key .”
MATH075

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review says the class was group-work heavy, inconvenient, and poorly supported.

Main concern

Students may need to learn through group work without enough instructor support.

What students said

“Most of the class was group work on statway.”
MATH142
“All of the and he didnt do anything about it.”
MATH142

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe difficult and , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book rules.

Hard TestsTest HeavyLow Test Averages

Assessment risk

Standard

47/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyHard Tests
“Lots of homework”
MATH075
“ teach anything at all”
MATH142

Online

The online review says tests had low averages but .

Low Test Averages
“All of the and he didnt do anything about it.”
MATH142

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His and he is good at breaking down difficult topics.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“His and he is good at breaking down difficult topics.”

⚠️ Recent Course Risk

52/100

“All he does it puts you in groups and makes you teach yourself all the work/units.”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“Home work every day but so practice is key .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and if you don't understand it he is willing to clarify.
  • He will answer all your questions and is just so .
  • he throws us into group assignments with no clarification of anything

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you don't have a background in math you will fail the class.
  • teach anything at all
  • All of the and he didnt do anything about it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across many years give broad evidence, though the most negative trend is concentrated in newer MATH142 comments.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH0755 reviews
MATH1423 reviews
MATH1352 reviews
MATH752 reviews
0751 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1