AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Melissa Anisko

MATH182 · MATH142 · MATH042 · MATH191 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a and earning a strong grade realistic with steady work.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and patientClear explanationsHelpful outside classManageable workloadAttendance matters
  • Students consistently describe Anisko as caring, patient, and clear.
  • Grades are very attainable, but students still need to attend and keep up with homework.
  • Online reviews are strong, though one student felt the format required more self-teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is very realistic because she grades fairly and helps students, but students still need to attend, ask questions, and .

Online evidence shows flexible late work and manageable assignments, while and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The math content still takes practice, but students say and makes difficult material easier to follow.

Online reviews praise clear explanations but include one self-teaching concern, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally strict in every review, but several students say skipping class will hurt performance.

Both formats include participation or clearer.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because , and genuinely invested in helping them pass.

Both online and , though online has one moderate concern about self-teaching.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students describe fair grading, forgiving late-work policies, and credit for .

Format shift

Online reviews give the strongest evidence of forgiving policies, while and many chances to understand.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Assignments are manageable but recurring, and some students describe a lot of .

Format shift

Online workload is manageable but steady, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students , and especially helpful for people who struggle with math.

Format shift

Both formats strongly support excellent teaching, with only one online review saying the format leaned too much on self-teaching.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and tests without showing that the class is purely exam-driven.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize worksheets, assignments, and support, while and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students strongly praise her teaching and support, but attendance and .

Main concern

Missing class or .

What students said

“TAKE. Absolutely fantastic math teacher who never assumes you know anything.”
MATH191
“Homework does take 2-4 hours but its only due every other week.”
MATH191

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students mostly praise her clarity, patience, flexibility, and through videos.

Main concern

Some online students may need to learn independently from videos and outside material.

What students said

“ and and genuinely cared about her student's success.”
MATH142
“you have to teach yourself when learning the material.”
MATH142

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and test problems, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

Tests MentionedHomework ReviewFair Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and studying, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Tests Are Lecture-BasedStudying Matters
“ if you pay attention to the lectures.”
MATH191
“def study!”
MATH142

Online

Online reviews mention test problems and credit policies, but they do not clearly prove online proctoring, webcam use, open-book rules, or Lockdown Browser.

Test Problems ReviewedPartial Credit Mentioned
“she goes through all hw and if you didnt get a .”
MATH182

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As someone who has always struggled with math, Prof. Anisko helped me a lot.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“Professor Anisko was very clear when explaining everything in the class and what is expected.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“If you need to take Math 142 I highly reccomend her class.”

⚖️

82/100

“Gives you lots of chances to understand the math, and grades very fairly.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof Anisko is lively and so clearly.
  • She goes from the ground up and .
  • She knows how to make math fun and has a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There are !
  • The but she is very lenient on when you submit them
  • Missing the class will definitely harm your grade

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She really cares about her students succeeding.
  • and caring towards her students and wants them to succeed.
  • and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 12 detailed reviews across online and and highly consistent.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1915 reviews
MATH1424 reviews
MATH0422 reviews
MATH1821 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values