AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rostislav Smirnov

ALGEBRA2HONOR · CALC2 · MATH192 · MATH075 · MATH110 · MATH75 · MATH135 · CLC001 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can learn math independently and tolerate a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesSelf-study heavyFast paceMixed personalityInconsistent grading
  • Students disagree sharply, but many negative and .
  • Success seems to depend on already knowing the material and studying independently.
  • Some students find him caring or fun, but others describe frustration, rudeness, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Getting an A appears possible only if you already understand the material and and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content becomes harder for many students because lectures are fast, incomplete, or unclear.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews mention canceled classes and being kicked out, but they do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

37/100

Recommendation is weak because many students warn that he teaches poorly, although a minority liked his personality and explanations.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report strange grading and leniency.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, but the main burden is unclear teaching rather than overwhelming workload.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Several reviews call him unclear, confusing, or rude, while a and cares.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

and tests, but do not show that the course is dominated by either one.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are highly mixed, with , and uneven treatment of students.

Main concern

.

What students said

“ if possible.”
MATH135
“You cannot depend on him to teach you; it is a self study class.”
MATH192
“ never rude.”
MATH75

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

if students know the material, but some students report and unfair difficulty.

Tests mentionedSome harder test concernsNo clear proctoring evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

44/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tests, including claims that some questions were not covered and that .

Tests in classPossible uncovered materialNo clear open-book or proctoring evidence
“There are .”
MATH135
“Once you understand the ”
MATH192
“the if you actually know the material.”
MATH110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You cannot depend on him to teach you; it is a self study class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom experience. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Lectures are incomplete and unclear.”

📚

38/100

“You cannot depend on him to teach you; it is a self study class.”

⚖️

28/100

“Homework and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and generally not interested in how well his students understand the material.
  • never rude.
  • He move fast so pay attention:)

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Once you understand the
  • There is
  • There are .

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • Rostislav is a legend
  • Wonderful sweet man.
  • Insults you if you ask a question or don't understand.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 18 reviews span many years and show consistent themes, though several older duplicate-style comments reduce precision.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH1105 reviews
CLC0014 reviews
MATH754 reviews
ALGEBRA2HONOR1 review
CALC21 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH0751 review
MATH1351 review
MATH1921 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values