AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ed Faulkner

MATH142 · MATH · MATH110 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can learn from the book and manage math practice independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProScattered lecturesKind but inconsistentHomework-heavySelf-study requiredFlexible deadlines
  • Students describe him as caring but .
  • The , but weak explanations push students toward self-study.
  • some older reviews and harsh criticism from others.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Getting a good grade seems possible with steady studying and homework, but .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

The math content is not described as impossible, but scattered lectures and self-teaching make it feel harder.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews mention math lab requirements but also say work has no due date, so flexibility appears mixed.

Only in-person reviews discuss attendance or schedule expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Students are split between appreciating his supportive style and warning that .

The recommendation picture .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Students suggest grades are achievable through honest work, but there is not enough proof of .

Format shift

and deadlines.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Tags and comments mention lots of homework, math lab, and .

Format shift

The workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

He is described as nice and well-intentioned, but multiple students .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize homework, corrections, math lab, and .

Format shift

and do not clearly describe exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

clarity, scattered lectures, and significant homework expectations.

Main concern

Many students say they had to rely on the book because lectures lacked detail.

What students said

“His and he does not go into detail on any chapter.”
MATH142
“work has no due date, it's all up to you.”
MATH

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His and he does not go into detail on any chapter.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“His and he does not go into detail on any chapter.”

📚 Workload

32/100

“He goes over all the homework, requires that you go to a math lab.”

⚖️ Grade Value

60/100

“if you study and do what u should you'll pass, probably with a pretty good grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He mixes up his words and number sometimes, not very lively either.
  • His and he does not go into detail on any chapter.
  • he really wants you to learn the stuff.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • work has no due date, it's all up to you.
  • if you study and do what u should you'll pass, probably with a pretty good grade.
  • He goes over all the homework, requires that you go to a math lab.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews provide mixed but useful evidence, though several are old and some are vague.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1424 reviews
MATH1 review
MATH1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values