AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Tom Judge

MATH121 · MATH191 · MATH90 · MATH294 · MATH095 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a supportive math professor and are willing to keep up with , and independent review.

Best fit · Effort For RewardInspirational teacherFair testsAttendance mattersTest-heavy gradingSome self-study needed
  • Students describe him as caring and inspirational, with fair but demanding math courses.
  • Grades can be strong, but , and preparation matter a lot.
  • Some course structure issues appear, including syllabus mismatch and lecture-platform mismatch.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

A grades are possible, but comments , and steady preparation rather than an effortless A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews analyzed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content is concept-focused and sometimes tough, especially for students returning to math or needing aligned course materials.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Multiple tags say participation matters and skipping class makes passing unlikely.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

, and fair, though structure and grading demands cause hesitation.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grading appears fair but not soft, with , and limited .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload is not described as overwhelming, but , and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students call him caring, inspirational, funny, and helpful, despite some course organization issues.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, and test-score-based grades.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but demanding math professor whose tests are mostly fair and .

Main concern

Students may need to self-study when pacing or course materials do not align.

What students said

“ , but the amount of time given to complete them is not quite so fair.”
MATH294
“Tom was a great Professor who really cared about his students.”
MATH90
“ .”
MATH095

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often fair and sometimes student-friendly, but timing limits, no calculators, and .

Fair TestsTimed QuizzesMultiple Exam AttemptsTight Test TimeNo Calculators

Assessment risk

Varies

67/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam attempts after remote transition, and no calculators in one class.

Fair TestsTimed QuizzesMultiple Exam AttemptsNo Calculators
“his quizzes are only 1-2 question and timed but not too hard, and all exams have 5 attempts without timed”
MATH121
“ , but the amount of time given to complete them is not quite so fair.”
MATH294
“NO CALCULATORS AND NO OPPORTUNITIES.”
MATH095

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Tom was a great Professor who really cared about his students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Great professor, got laughs out of the entire class.”

⚖️

58/100

“if you studied and did what was expected, I can't see anyone upset at the grade the received as reflected.”

📝

82/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Tom was a great Professor who really cared about his students.
  • Great professor, got laughs out of the entire class.
  • the prof. was very inspirational

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I was
  • , but the amount of time given to complete them is not quite so fair.
  • NO CALCULATORS AND NO OPPORTUNITIES.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

but limited evidence with some mixed experiences.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH0951 review
MATH1211 review
MATH1911 review
MATH2941 review
MATH901 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1