AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Marilyn Green

MATH121 · MATH142 · MATH120 · MATH110 · MATH119 · MATH135 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you are willing to practice heavily, ask questions often, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but inconsistentHard testsDisorganized lecturesHelpful outside classHomework-heavy
  • Students often describe her as kind and willing .
  • as much harder than lectures, practice, or homework.
  • The main risk is inconsistent organization, which makes the course harder for students already weak in math.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible with and practice, but and few graded items make it costly.

Online evidence is mixed, while studying and test recovery.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content is made harder by fast or and .

Both formats mention difficulty, but and tests create the challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

Only , and there is no strong evidence of strict attendance rules.

; online reviews do not clearly discuss attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Students recommend her when they value patience and support, but many warn that disorganization and .

Online reviews are sharply split, while and frustrated students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

She sometimes offers redemption or makeup support, but , and .

Format shift

, while in-person reviews add optional redemption tests and occasional leniency.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Homework and studying are repeatedly described as necessary, with some students dropping because they could not keep up.

Format shift

Both formats mention homework, but and workload.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Her caring support is real, but many students find the .

Format shift

Online evidence is split between excellent support and poor organization, while reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades appear heavily driven by tests, quizzes, and than grade weight.

Format shift

Online reviews say exams dominated the grade, and , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a caring professor whose helpfulness , and uneven teaching clarity.

Main concern

Students who struggle in math may find the lectures and .

What students said

“Her lectures are incredibly disorganized and confusing, and her examples and is on the test.”
MATH135
“ .”
MATH110
“practice with .”
MATH121

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are and one very negative experience with and disorganization.

Main concern

Online and unclear lectures without enough structure.

What students said

“Her tests and and they were the only things that would .”
MATH121
“She really wants you to understand the concepts and is more than willing to go over things with you over and over again.”
MATH119

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book policy, but and .

Hard ExamsFew Graded ItemsRedemption TestsFinal Exam

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring policy, but they describe difficult tests, quizzes, finals, and .

Hard TestsQuizzesFinal ExamRedemption Tests
“4 tests (including final) & 4 quizzes.”
MATH121
“she .”
MATH121
“when you think you are prepared for a difficulty.”
MATH135

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policy, but and and grade-dominant.

Hard ExamsFew Graded Items
“Her tests and and they were the only things that would .”
MATH121

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , but thats where it ends. and confusing, and her examples and homework she gives are completely different than what is on the test.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“ .”

⚖️

28/100

“Her tests and and they were the only things that would .”

❤️ Student Support

70/100

“She is very diligent on giving personal attention to those students who need it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are incredibly disorganized and confusing, and her examples and is on the test.
  • .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I almost failed every test, in my opinion they were very difficult, but she .
  • Do the homework! It will benefit you if you do bad on a .
  • She doesn't offer . She doesn't grade on a !

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is just a wonderful person, too.
  • Marilyn will help & answer all your .
  • Very knowledgeable. Spends a lot of extra time with students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The 20 reviews span many years and show a and serious organization or .

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH1357 reviews
MATH1104 reviews
MATH1213 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATH1422 reviews
Show 2 more courses
1201 review
MATH1191 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Rather not say 1