AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Firouzeh Zandi

COMPSCI110 · COMP1320 · CS101 · CNT105 · EXCEL · COM101 · COMSC101 · CSCI100 · COMSC100 · COMSC1245 · COMPS100 · COMSC1010213 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Avoid unless you only need the credit and can teach yourself while carefully tracking your grades.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesEasy A but poor learningSelf-teaching requiredGrade tracking issuesHard to get help
  • Most students describe lectures as , and weak for learning computer science.
  • The class can be easy for grades, especially for students with prior computer knowledge or strong self-teaching skills.
  • Several reviews warn about poor help, missed grade entries, communication problems, and chaotic class time.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Grades can be easy for prepared or self-taught students, but and .

Online evidence warns about fighting for grades, while easy.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The course content is often described as basic and easy, but poor instruction makes it feel harder for beginners.

Online evidence focuses on chaotic delivery, while easy.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Participation and , and one review says punctuality is enforced publicly.

The online review tags attendance as necessary, while , and strictness about arriving on time.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

because and students often must teach themselves.

The online review is negative, and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Some reviews mention easy exams and , but , and disappointing outcomes.

Format shift

Online evidence is negative about grade tracking, while .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is not usually described as overwhelming, but and presentations can be difficult without teaching support.

Format shift

Online workload detail is limited, while in-person reviews mention tests, programming exercises, presentations, and article summaries.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

The dominant pattern is knowledgeable but ineffective teaching, with scattered lectures and little useful help.

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both criticize lecture organization, with .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears to mix tests, quizzes, programming assignments, presentations, articles, participation, and .

Format shift

Online assessment details are unclear, while in-person , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews mostly describe easy material but , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Students often say they learn little and must rely on themselves.

What students said

“Ridiculously easy class, but you will learn NOTHING.”
COMSC100
“Expect to teach yourself and have long lectures that .”
CS101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative and warns about chaotic lecture time and needing to fight for grades.

Main concern

Grade records and lecture organization are the biggest concerns.

What students said

“Be prepared to fight for your grade like your life depends on it.”
COMSC100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as easy, but .

TestsQuizzesExtra CreditUnclear Midterm Coverage

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes that are often easy, but one review says the midterm included untaught material.

2 Tests And 2 QuizzesEasy ExamsUnclear Midterm Coverage
“The .”
COMSC100
“ .”
COMPS100

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her course was not difficult at all, but her lectures were all over the place and her course but don't expect to learn much.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She knows her stuff but is horrible at teaching it.”

📈 Easy A Potential

82/100

“Ridiculously easy class, but you will learn NOTHING.”

⚠️ Grade Risk

55/100

“Be prepared to fight for your grade like your life depends on it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and .
  • Lectures are random and .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • it's easy to get an A in her course but don't expect to learn much.
  • Id deffinately call it an easy A class though
  • Meh, the more you participate the more you get.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support And Organization

  • Very hard to get a hold of. She doesn't check her emails.
  • Also so I ended up turning in almost every coding program twice.
  • Expect to teach yourself and have long lectures that .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty reviews over a long time span are detailed and highly consistent in describing weak teaching despite easy content.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 59
1 out of 514

Course coverage

COMSC10015 reviews
COMSC1013 reviews
CNT1052 reviews
EXCEL2 reviews
COM1011 review
Show 7 more courses
COMP13201 review
COMPS1001 review
COMPSCI1101 review
COMSC-101-02131 review
COMSC12451 review
CS1011 review
CSCI1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 2