AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Monte Collazo

MATH121 · MAT90 · MAT292 · MATH191 · MATH294 · MATH120 · CALC1 · MATH292 · MATH192 · MATH110 · MATH193 · MATH134 · MATH135 · 67 lifetime ratings

AI rating
65/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can handle a strict, test-focused math class and and practice problems.

Best fit · Self Taught ProClear examplesStrict gradingTest heavyExtra creditPolarizing style
  • , while others find him strict, intimidating, or .
  • Grades can be very good for , and use his prep materials.
  • Assessment is test-heavy, and weak math preparation can make the class feel risky.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

63/100

An A is possible with consistent study and , but the and strict style make it far from automatic.

All evidence comes from in-person math reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The math content is inherently challenging, and students who lack preparation often describe the pace, exams, and grading as difficult.

Only in-person reviews exist, and difficulty varies strongly by course level and student preparation.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

, but students say showing up and taking notes is important for passing.

but practically important.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

61/100

He is recommended for prepared, independent math students, but many students and intimidating style.

and sharply mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Some reviews mention , dropped scores, and easy tests, while others report harsh quiz and .

Format shift

on course and student fit.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

, but students must still study it because exams and quizzes come from similar problems.

Format shift

but meaningful self-study demands.

Teaching experience

Average

68/100

and useful, while others cite tangents, accent issues, strictness, and poor support.

Format shift

and years.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades are mainly driven by quizzes, tests, and .

Format shift

, and finals as the main grading basis.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews show a polarizing math professor with strong explanations for prepared students but and .

Main concern

The main concern is strict, exam-centered grading with limited tolerance for weak preparation.

What students said

“Tests and and basic. No tricks.”
MATH192
“He grades really harsh.”
MATH193
“ but if you are not good at math, then you better show up!”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The but not uniformly harsh, with some reviews mentioning open-book quizzes, cheat sheets, dropped scores, or .

Test HeavyQuizzesFinal ExamSome Open-Book QuizzesCheat Sheet Sometimes Allowed

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and finals, with some student-friendly features but also strict grading complaints.

Weekly QuizzesTestsFinal ExamOpen-Book QuizzesCheat Sheet Sometimes Allowed
“1 quiz every week at the start of class”
MATH192
“He allows a cheat sheet on the exams”
MATH193
“ .”
MAT90

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Collazzo's lectures are so good. He gives excellent examples.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and polarized student experience. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“He gives excellent examples. know to succeed at calculus!”

🧪

88/100

“4 exams, 1 final.”

⚖️

55/100

“He grades really harsh.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He takes the and will happily answer any questions you have.
  • He breaks everything down as simply as possible and he's funny (on accident lol
  • He's pretty strict and goes on many tangents.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • but prepares you well for the tests and quizzes.
  • , if you do better on the next
  • If you don't know Calc like the back of your hand, you will fail.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • Tests and and basic. No tricks.
  • , so pass them.
  • The

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

67

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews over a long time span provide detailed, recurring but , and student fit.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 513
3 out of 54
2 out of 511
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH11014 reviews
MATH19310 reviews
MATH1927 reviews
MATH2926 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
Show 10 more courses
MATH1912 reviews
1201 review
1211 review
CALC11 review
MAT2921 review
MAT901 review
MATH1211 review
MATH1341 review
MATH1351 review
MATH2941 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 4 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1