AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

William Breder

MATH124 · MATH121 · MATH142 · MATH194 · MATH120 · MTH142 · MATH140 · STATS142 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
88.46%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a and can consistently attend and take notes.

Best fit · Easy A HunterClear lecturesEasy examsOpen-note group quizzesAttendance mattersDry humor
  • Most students describe his math classes as , and much easier than expected.
  • Grades are helped by open-note or , and sometimes .
  • because class is lecture-heavy and notes drive quizzes and exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

93/100

Getting an A is very realistic because tests mirror quizzes, quizzes are often open-note or group-based, and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

Students repeatedly say he makes statistics and other math topics understandable, though linear algebra and note-heavy classes require attention.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because lectures, notes, quizzes, and participation directly support grades.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

because , and makes math feel manageable.

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

91/100

quizzes, completion credit, dropped work, and effort-based help.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

84/100

Workload is light because many reviews mention little or and , and notes.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Most students describe him as , and able to make math understandable despite a few strong negative reviews.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

Grades are mostly driven by quizzes, tests, and a final, with .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person students mostly report , and easy tests tied closely to class notes.

Main concern

Skipping class is risky because notes and participation are central to success.

What students said

“ and you can work with others.”
MATH142
“ if you do well on the quizzes.”
MATH142
“You must show up for class or .”
MATH194

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are generally student-friendly, with open-note or group quizzes and .

Open-Note QuizzesGroup QuizzesEasy TestsNotecard TestsTake-Home Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support open-note or , and .

Open-Note QuizzesGroup QuizzesEasy TestsNotecard TestsTake-Home Quizzes
“ and you can work with others.”
MATH142
“There are only 3 tests, a few quizzes, and a .”
MATH124
“ and 3-4 exams.”
MATH194

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy. . you will thank me. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Breder makes stats very understandable and .”

📈 Easy A Potential

93/100

“I did terrible at stat in high school and I got an A in his class.”

📝

88/100

“The .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and understandable.
  • .
  • you if you really need it.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • For HW and if you just submit.
  • He really wants everyone to do well and will grade accordingly.
  • He gives you choice to have good/bad grade. It's up to you.

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload

  • and tests.
  • , and a final.
  • Not a ton of HW.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

89/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 26 detailed reviews span several years and , and attendance importance.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH14210 reviews
MATH1204 reviews
MATH1244 reviews
MATH1944 reviews
MATH1211 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH1401 review
MTH1421 review
STATS1421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 2 · A 10

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2