AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sydney Iturraran

MAT192 · MATH192 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a supportive but work-heavy calculus class where effort usually pays off.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear expectationsGenerous gradingLots of homeworkExtra creditMixed final policy
  • Two reviews strongly praise her clarity, kindness, and .
  • Students describe calculus as effort-based, with homework and supporting grades.
  • One and a final-exam grade cap.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is possible with , and , but students still describe meaningful homework and effort.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Calculus remains challenging, but positive reviews say she explains concepts clearly enough to make them easier to understand.

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person calculus reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

There are no online reviews, and in-person .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Most students recommend her because , and fair, though one review strongly warns against the class.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

, and , but one student reports a strict final-grade cap.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students mention lots of homework, so the class is .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Two students describe her as , and helpful, while one reports syllabus confusion.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and a consequential final, suggesting a mix of assignments and exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive but warn that and .

Main concern

The and a potentially strict final-related grade rule.

What students said

“Shes a good teacher that makes calculus concepts really easy to understand”
MATH192
“if you get less than a C on the in the class”
MATH192

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because one review reports extra material on tests and a .

Tests with extra materialFinal grade cap reported

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a , but do not clearly prove proctoring, closed-book rules, open-book rules, or take-home format.

Extra material on testsFinal grade cap reported
“ .”
MATH192
“if you get less than a C on the in the class”
MATH192

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I didn't get an A and it is the type of class where you'll get the grade for the effort you put it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Shes a good teacher that makes calculus concepts , and a nice person.”

⚖️

72/100

“Professor Iturraran was always kind, kept us fairly engaged and .”

🧪

45/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • makes calculus concepts really easy to understand

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you'll get the grade for the effort you put it
  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Risk

  • .
  • failed to mention that if you get less than a C on the in the class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, and they contain a sharp split between two very positive comments and one very negative one.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1922 reviews
MAT1921 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values