AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

A Alabovskaya

MATH · MATH142 · COSTCO · MATH191 · MATH132 · MATH294 · CALCULUS · MATH120 · MATH135 · MATH292 · MATH192 · MATH183 · MATH193 · M294 · MA294 · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you can self-teach math, tolerate heavy homework, and follow her exact problem-solving style.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh GradingLots Of HomeworkUnclear LecturesTest HeavySelf-Teaching Required
  • Most students describe unclear lectures and .
  • Homework and as heavy, strict, and stressful.
  • Some students report grade recovery through corrections or , but the teaching experience is still widely criticized.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students mention corrections, , and possible A grades, but the A , and self-teaching.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Math content is already demanding, and , and heavy homework make it feel much harder.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Students repeatedly say going to class is necessary, even when they also say they must study heavily on their own.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students warn against taking her because , and the workload is heavy.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person and overwhelmingly negative despite a few positive outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Many students report little or no partial credit, strict method requirements, and severe penalties for small mistakes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and multiple exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

28/100

Most comments say , and often require students to learn from the book or online resources.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

The course is repeatedly described as , and homework supporting exam preparation.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative overall, with , and harsh exams.

Main concern

Students often need to teach themselves while and a heavy workload.

What students said

“ , and there is no partial credit.”
MATH294
“The ”
MATH294
“prepare yourself to study on your own.”
MATH192

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed but mostly strict, with many reports of hard tests and , or rare take-home exams.

Test HeavyHard ExamsLimited Partial CreditTest CorrectionsCheat Sheet MentionedTake-Home Exams Mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews repeatedly describe difficult exams with strict grading, though .

Test HeavyHard ExamsLimited Partial CreditTest CorrectionsCheat Sheet MentionedTake-Home Exams Mentioned
“ , and there is no partial credit.”
MATH294
“she allows a 1 page cheat sheet for every quizexam.”
MATH191
“There are . Easy A.”
MATH193

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“prepare yourself to study on your own.”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She knows her stuff but the .”

⚖️

18/100

“Make any little mistake on the test and you get a 0 on that question”

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“The of writing due PER class meeting”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lectures are very difficult to follow because of her handwriting and accent.
  • but gives a lot of .
  • terrible teacher. might as well teach yourself the subject.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , and there is no partial credit.
  • Class average was 50% on tests
  • Differential Equations is a hard class but it really isn't that hard to get an A with her.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • assigns insane amounts of homework
  • Lots of .
  • The number of .

Theme 4

⚠️ About Student Advice

  • !
  • Just don't. Please just don't.
  • if it's a last resort.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The review count is large, spans many years, and shows highly consistent complaints despite a few positive outliers.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 59
2 out of 57
1 out of 523

Course coverage

MATH29414 reviews
MATH1924 reviews
1923 reviews
MATH1423 reviews
MATH1933 reviews
Show 12 more courses
MATH2923 reviews
MATH1352 reviews
MATH1912 reviews
1931 review
CALCULUS1 review
COSTCO1 review
M2941 review
MA2941 review
MATH1 review
MATH1201 review
MATH1321 review
MATH1831 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 3

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 3