AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Helen Kow

COMP256 · CPROGRAMMING · COMSC255 · COMS265 · CS11063 · CS265 · CSC · COMSC266 · COMSC265 · CSC265 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a clear, supportive programming instructor .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear ExplainerHelpful MentorBeginner FriendlyFunnyOrganized
  • Students overwhelmingly describe her as , and easy to understand.
  • She is especially strong for .
  • The main weakness is limited, with only one review describing discouraging classroom behavior.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students say she grades fairly and helps students succeed, but programming still requires real effort.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

She makes technical programming material understandable, though several reviews still rate the courses as moderately difficult.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently credit her for making complex material clearer.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a strict attendance policy, and .

and entirely from in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students almost universally recommend her because , and effective at teaching programming.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Reviews describe fair grading and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Assignments are part of the class, but reviews do not describe the workload as overwhelming.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students , and ability to teach programming well.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and programming practice more than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students consistently praise her clarity, humor, organization, and willingness to help.

Main concern

One older review says she yelled at students and discouraged motivation.

What students said

“So a toddler.”
CS265
“ and explaining and always willing to help you along the way.”
COMSC266
“I was discouraged due to her negative talk about the field.”
CSC

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the final requirements.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proved

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring requirements.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proved

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to .”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity, support, and programming learning. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“So a toddler.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“Hands down, one of .”

🤝 Student Support

90/100

“She goes twice the distance that you go to reach and help you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Ms. Kow is simply amazing.... taking technical and complex material and making it very enjoyable learning and participating in her class.
  • She was funny and easy to understand.
  • .

Theme 2

💻 About Learning Programming

  • Thanks to her, I can now call myself a programmer.
  • Excellent Teacher and the person I can attribute my ability to program to.
  • If you want to .

Theme 3

🤝 About Helpfulness

  • and easy to communciate with.
  • Always approachable; and course.
  • you feel bad about asking them.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is consistent and positive across 20 reviews, but many reviews are old and several are brief.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COMSC2665 reviews
COMSC2654 reviews
COMP2562 reviews
COMS2652 reviews
CS2652 reviews
Show 5 more courses
COMSC2551 review
CPROGRAMMING1 review
CS110631 review
CSC1 review
CSC2651 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values