AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Willard Hoskins

STATS1 · MATH101 · MATH192 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with classwork.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGood teaching styleExtra creditLots of homeworkHelpful pacingFunny lectures
  • Students describe him as engaging, funny, and .
  • and .
  • The workload can be high, and missing class means missing graded exercises.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

and , but students still need to attend and do the work.

All grade-effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The courses include real math content, including compressed calculus, but his pacing and examples make it manageable.

Only in-person reviews describe course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Attendance is not formally required, but missing .

Only in-person reviews mention attendance, and they show attendance matters for .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students recommend him because he teaches clearly, keeps class engaging, and gives .

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

and tests where most questions could .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Students mention lots of homework and many in-class exercises, so the workload is steady rather than light.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Reviews describe him as funny, helpful, well-paced, and effective, though the sample is small.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and in-class exercises for points.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and engaging math professor who offers and many point opportunities.

Main concern

if they miss in-class exercises.

What students said

“He makes you laugh while teaching.”
MATH101
“He gives a lot of opportunities to get ”
STATS1
“The so that it didn't feel rushed at all.”
MATH192

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and , but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book rules.

Tests MentionedExtra CreditIn-Class Exercises

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and in-class point exercises, but .

Tests MentionedIn-Class Exercises
“most of the tests were 8 or 9 out of 10 questions would be 100%”
STATS1
“We had lots of in class exercises that counted for points”
STATS1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He has a really good teaching style.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“The so that it didn't feel rushed at all.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“He is by far one of my favorites ive had in college!”

⚖️

88/100

“He gives a lot of opportunities to get ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes you laugh while teaching.
  • He has a really good teaching style.
  • He provides plenty of examples as we went along, .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • He gives a lot of opportunities to get
  • We had lots of in class exercises that counted for points
  • I took this Calculus class in a short summer semester, so a lot of advanced content was crammed into a short period of time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, and one is older, but the comments are specific and mostly consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1011 review
MATH1921 review
STATS11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values