AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

K Harkness

MATH · MATHMATH · DONTREMEMBER · PREALEGABRA · MATH120 · MATH110 · MATH75 · MATH075 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you and an old-school classroom style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrict graderShow-work requiredPolarizing teachingOld-school styleHomework-heavy
  • Reviews are highly polarized, with and others calling the experience very negative.
  • The dominant concern is strict, exact-method grading where correct answers may lose credit if work is not shown her way.
  • Students who need a patient and flexible math environment may struggle with the tone, workload, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting a high grade appears difficult because , and showing work exactly as required.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Basic math content can become harder because students repeatedly say her explanations or strict .

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

because classwork and , but one review says attendance is not a major issue.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Recent and repeated reviews strongly advise against taking , and an unapproachable tone.

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Many students say she is extremely picky, marks correct answers wrong for method issues, and gives little partial credit.

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Reviews mention lots of , and heavy practice expectations.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some students praise clear teaching, but the dominant pattern is complaints about confusion, rigidity, and feeling belittled.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades , and strict written work rather than only exams or only assignments.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a split between students who value her structure and students who and tone.

Main concern

and perceived harsh treatment are the main repeated complaints.

What students said

“If you do not show work exactly as she wants it the answer will be marked wrong.”
MATH120
“She is so helpful and kind and she does not make youb feel shamed!”
MATH075

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , but as strict and heavily tied to showing work exactly her way.

Strict Work RequirementsTests MentionedPractice Test ReviewLimited Partial Credit

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tests and practice tests, but the than a specific proctoring format.

Strict Work RequirementsTests MentionedPractice Test ReviewLimited Partial Credit
“She doesn't give partial credit when math is the ONE subject partial credit should be given.”
MATH120
“Gives you a and does each and every problem with the class a week before the test.”
MATH075

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you do not show work exactly as she wants it the answer will be marked wrong.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

12/100

“getting the correct answer isant enough the work has to be written perfectly or no credit.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“She made easy things seem hard!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“ ”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • She LOVES her red pen on classwork, hw, and tests.
  • She'll give u points off for things that have nothing to do with u getting the right answer or not
  • not her way you will be marked wrong

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She made easy things seem hard!
  • and thoroughly.

Theme 3

📚

  • but that's how you learn
  • Go to class as much as possible because she does give class work for every lesson she teaches.
  • missing a class, u will miss a lot.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-nine in-person reviews across many years provide detailed, consistent evidence of .

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH12015 reviews
MATH0757 reviews
1201 review
DONTREMEMBER1 review
MATH1 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH1101 review
MATH751 review
MATHMATH1 review
PREALEGABRA1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1