AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mei Tsai

MATH120 · STATS142 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and tolerate weak instructional support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusingSelf-teaching requiredHard to understandPoor supportAvoid
  • Most reviews describe severe teaching problems and confusion.
  • Students report weak support, poor communication, and having to teach themselves.
  • Even the most positive review says success requires major effort, attention, and time.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

One student earned an A, but the comments show it takes significant self-teaching and persistence.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course feels harder because students repeatedly say the and hard to understand.

All course and statistics reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an , so flexibility cannot be determined.

No online or or mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students overwhelmingly advise against taking her because of and poor support.

Recommendation and is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Grade evidence is limited, but the difficulty complaints and low outcomes suggest getting through the class is not forgiving.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload burden is high because students report needing major independent effort to understand and pass.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Reviews repeatedly describe her as , and unsuitable for teaching.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether grading .

Format shift

No review gives a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, focusing on confusing teaching, poor accessibility, and high difficulty.

Main concern

Students say they must teach themselves because instruction and support are weak.

What students said

“i'm basically teaching myself.”
MATH120
“Makes you to ask students for help, not her.”
STATS142
“Absolutely the .”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in-person reviews criticize teaching quality but .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“honestly, she is so confusing and has made this class so difficult for me and everyone in my class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting teaching, support, and difficulty themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Absolutely the .”

👎 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ .”

📉 Learning Burden

28/100

“i'm basically teaching myself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is so confusing
  • Absolutely the .
  • she really should not be teaching

Theme 2

🚫 About Support

  • isn't in her office during office hours half the time
  • Makes you to ask students for help, not her.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty And Passing

  • given enough effort, attention, and time it is possible to understand her and pass the class.
  • has made this class so difficult for me and everyone in my class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

and strongly negative, though the sample size is still limited.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1204 reviews
STATS1421 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1