AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

G Castro-Gonzalez

MATH142 · MATH191 · MATH8224 · MATH120 · MATH192 · MATH193 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid him unless you already know the material and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh gradingDifficult testsHeavy accentLow question supportHigh risk for beginners
  • Most students describe the class as very hard, with difficult tests and .
  • Several reviews say he does not welcome questions and is hard to understand because of a heavy accent.
  • A few students learned well or earned high grades, but the overall tone strongly warns students away.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students repeatedly , and even withdrawals.

All .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The material becomes especially difficult because lectures use simple examples while .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

because students warn that skipping or even being tardy can hurt performance.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

because they felt unsupported, overtested, and graded harshly.

The recommendation evidence is entirely in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students repeatedly call him a and say he grades hard or fails students.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

as frequent or heavy, with test preparation adding major pressure.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

Although a few students praise his knowledge, most reviews describe unclear communication, poor support, and rude interactions.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Reviews heavily , and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, with repeated concerns , and limited help.

Main concern

The main and limited question support.

What students said

“ if you already know the subject material.”
MATH120
“Grades hard!”
MATH191
“he gives tons of homework”
MATH142

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear strict and high-risk because students repeatedly describe very difficult tests, though proctoring and book rules are not clearly proven.

Difficult TestsTest HeavyDropped Lowest Test

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove open-book status, proctoring, or closed-book rules.

Difficult TestsTest HeavyDropped Lowest Test
“ .”
MATH120
“ and .”
MATH192
“chooses extremely difficult problems for tests.”
MATH191

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you already know the subject material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“He won't teach you anything.”

⚖️

15/100

“Grades hard!”

📝

20/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a good teacher and makes math easy to understand.
  • you cant even understand half of what he says.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class was kinda tough.
  • Grades hard!
  • he gives tons of homework

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recommendation

  • .
  • AVIOD AT ALL COSTS!!!
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

and consistent concerns, despite a few positive outliers.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1203 reviews
MATH1923 reviews
12082361 review
MATH1421 review
MATH1911 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH1931 review
MATH82241 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1