AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Liz Czapla

MATH · MATH124 · 120SP · MATH253 · 135SP · MATH194 · MATH191 · MATH294 · MATH120 · MATH201 · MATH292 · MATH192 · MATH193 · MATH135 · LINEARALGEBRA · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take her if you value a and , and some independent learning.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHelpful and patientTough testsClear notesFair but demandingSelf-study needed
  • Students often , and willingness to answer questions.
  • Many reviews warn that review materials, especially in higher math courses.
  • The experience varies sharply by course level, with self-paced and lower-level classes sounding easier than calculus and advanced courses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible, but many comments , and the need for heavy studying or tutoring.

All evidence is from in-person reviews, with easier outcomes mainly in lower-level or self-paced classes.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The math content and , and several students say they had to learn from the book or .

Only in-person reviews exist, and difficulty varies by course level.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but several comments warn not to miss lecture and rely on class notes.

, and they frame it as important rather than officially required.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and helpful, but and inconsistent teaching experiences create real hesitation.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with strong disagreement between positive and negative experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some students praise fair partial credit and dropped quizzes or exams, but and .

Format shift

and mixed across courses.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

, with higher-level classes requiring substantial extra practice.

Format shift

Only in-person workload evidence exists, and it varies strongly by course.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

She is often helpful, patient, and clear, but some students report textbook-copying lectures, mistakes, and self-teaching.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person and highly mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Comments repeatedly emphasize quizzes, midterms, finals, and difficult tests as the main grade pressure.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a mixed but usable instructor profile: helpful and , but often demanding with and occasional self-teaching.

Main concern

Tests are repeatedly described as difficult and .

What students said

“The only bad thing about her is that the , and problems on the test can be some that you .”
MATH193
“Massive amount of homework and , if you can, find another professor or wait another semester.”
MATH193
“ .”
MATH124

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and quizzes, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Difficult testsWeekly quizzesMidterms and finalPartial creditDropped lowest quizzes or exam in some classes

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and finals, with some partial credit or dropped-score policies.

Difficult testsWeekly quizzesMidterms and finalPartial creditDropped lowest quizzes or exam in some classes
“There are 3 exams and .”
MATH193
“There is 4 exams including finals and .”
MATH191
“The .”
192

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was very thorough during lectures and always, always stopped to check for clarity and make sure that everyone was on the same page in terms of understanding”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“She was very thorough during lectures and always, always stopped to check for clarity and make sure that everyone was on the same page in terms of understanding”

🧪

32/100

“The her class because of the .”

⚖️

48/100

“She grades pretty fair- just show your work and you might get partial credit.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a decent teacher, she does help when you have questions and sometimes she relates the material to things you can understand.
  • Her lectures are complete, I never opened the book except for HW.
  • She copies everything from the book onto the board.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The only bad thing about her is that the , and problems on the test can be some that you .
  • Massive amount of homework and , if you can, find another professor or wait another semester.
  • You have to know the textbook by heart if you want to get an A in her course.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Liz is a , and .
  • She is always friendly and .
  • and approachable, and you can have conversations unrelated to math.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-nine in-person reviews span several years and courses, with enough detail to show both consistent strengths and .

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 510
3 out of 57
2 out of 55
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1926 reviews
MATH1935 reviews
MATH1945 reviews
MATH1354 reviews
MATH1243 reviews
Show 13 more courses
MATH1913 reviews
MATH2012 reviews
120SP1 review
135SP1 review
1921 review
1941 review
2941 review
LINEARALGEBRA1 review
MATH1 review
MATH1201 review
MATH2531 review
MATH2921 review
MATH2941 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 1