AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Salem Abaalhareth

MATH142 · MATH121 · MATH192 · MATH120 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you can learn from notes and homework, because the .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra CreditNice ProfessorEasy ExamsSometimes UnclearFair Grading
  • Students consistently describe Salem Abaalhareth as kind, helpful, and .
  • because , and textbook material.
  • Teaching clarity is mixed, so students weak in math may struggle despite the forgiving structure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is very reachable , and frequent .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course structure is straightforward, but for weaker students.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

, and no review contradicts it.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and , but lecture clarity creates real hesitation.

, and they show both strong praise and teaching concerns.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

, and easy exams make grading very forgiving.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

, and reviews do not describe the workload as heavy.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

He is kind and helpful, but several students say his explanations and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

Grades combine online homework, quizzes in some classes, multiple tests, and a final.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a forgiving math class with , and uneven lecture clarity.

Main concern

Lectures can be unclear or slide-based, especially for .

What students said

“Gives good amount of .”
MATH142
“ , and it's not necessary either because all he does is read off of slides.”
MATH142
“Three tests and a , 0 quizzes.”
MATH192

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally described as easy, based on notes and homework, and supported by or dropped scores.

Easy ExamsExtra CreditDropped Lowest TestNote Card AllowedReview Before Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as fair or easy, with support such as , review sessions, dropped tests, and a note card in one course.

Easy ExamsExtra CreditDropped Lowest TestNote Card AllowedReview Before Tests
“ !”
MATH192
“Allows a small note card for .”
MATH121
“ .”
MATH142

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Good guy, bad teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“He is a nice guy, but the .”

📈 Easy A Potential

86/100

“This class was easy A.”

⚖️

88/100

“Very fair grader, gives .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a .
  • He is a nice guy, but the .
  • but he still was a great teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A lot of extra credits.
  • Three tests and a , 0 quizzes.
  • He doesn't assign too much HW and bases all of his quiz and as well.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • Tests and .
  • Allows a small note card for .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across multiple math courses give detailed and mostly consistent evidence, despite some mixed teaching-quality opinions.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1424 reviews
MATH1212 reviews
MATH1922 reviews
MATH1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1