AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Brandon Fitzgerald

CALC192 · CALC193 · MATH192 · MATH110 · MATH182 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and use office hours when the class becomes unclear.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing teaching qualityHelpful in office hoursUnorganized lecturesReasonable workloadPoor homework support
  • Reviews are sharply split between very negative teaching complaints and a few strong praise comments.
  • Calculus students report confusing homework support, but one review .
  • Getting an A may be possible, but the learning experience is unreliable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Two reported A grades and partial credit help, but comments do not support an easy A because several students describe poor guidance and difficult learning conditions.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The calculus content is not easy, and some students.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most comments warn against taking him, even though a minority praise his help and teaching style.

Recommendation and is strongly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Partial credit for , but the overall evidence is limited.

Format shift

evidence.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

One review calls the workload reasonable, while others .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Several students call him a very bad teacher, while a and even excellent.

Format shift

All , and the tone is highly polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention homework, study guides, and and exams.

Format shift

Only in-person comments mention assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but lean negative, with repeated complaints about poor teaching and organization offset by a few helpfulness comments.

Main concern

Students may need to and .

What students said

“ .”
CALC192
“he is a but as well”
MATH192
“Very bad teacher assigns mostly even problems on HW so your unable to find out if your doing it correctly.”
MATH182

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and study guides but do not clearly prove strict proctoring, open-book rules, or .

TestsStudy GuidesPartial Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study guides, with some credit for showing work but .

TestsStudy GuidesPartial Credit
“he gives a lot of ”
MATH192
“ ”
MATH182

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's actually a pretty good teacher although he is a but as well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ .”

📘 Helpfulness

55/100

“I went in for help during office hours and he explained everything.”

⚖️

55/100

“he gives a lot of ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Very if possible
  • Honestly one of the and I HATE math.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Support

  • the workload is reasonable
  • Very bad teacher assigns mostly even problems on HW so your unable to find out if your doing it correctly.
  • Unless you ask during class or go to office hours (1 hour) which is usually swarmed with students asking Q's

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

but are dated and split in tone.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CALC1921 review
CALC1931 review
MATH1101 review
MATH1821 review
MATH1921 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1