AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ramesh Narasimhan

MATH142 · MATH194 · MATH120 · MATH192 · STATS142 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take him if you can self-study and , but if you need structure and reliable pacing.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunny and personableClear when organizedInconsistent organizationHard testsFair grading
  • Students often describe him as funny, kind, and engaging.
  • and disorganized, unreliable course management.
  • Grades can be fair or easy in some courses, but as hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Some students report easy grading or easy A outcomes, but and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The math content can feel manageable when explained clearly, but fast pacing and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

as strictly enforced, but students say showing up and taking notes matters.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and fairness, but the disorganization creates real risk.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Students describe him as fair or easy in and note sheets in some classes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

, but students still need steady .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

, and helpful, but several reviews describe poor organization and unreliable follow-through.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Several reviews say the grade depends heavily on tests, with .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All evidence is from in-person classes, where students praise his personality and fairness but often warn about disorganization and .

Main concern

Course organization and .

What students said

“He teaches math really clearly and wants his students to understand it.”
MATH120
“Be prepared to learn everything on your own.”
MATH192
“ .”
192

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews repeatedly mention hard tests, though some policies like a note sheet, dropped lowest test, and .

Hard TestsDropped Lowest TestSheet of Notes AllowedExtra Credit Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

supports, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Hard TestsDropped Lowest TestSheet of Notes AllowedExtra Credit Quizzes
“ , and allows sheet of notes.”
MATH142
“ but .”
MATH120
“ and second.”
MATH194

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and really loves to teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“He teaches math really clearly and wants his students to understand it.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

45/100

“Teacher was very nice, but extremely lazy and disorganized.”

🧪

58/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Ramesh was the !
  • and concise in his lectures.
  • He always kept the class very lively and truly does want everyone to do well.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • but .
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • Cancelled many classes and never followed the planned schedules.
  • Hardly ever followed through with .
  • He goes over .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The 12 in-person reviews span multiple courses and show a consistent split between strong personality and weak organization.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1204 reviews
MATH1424 reviews
1921 review
MATH1921 review
MATH1941 review
Show 1 more courses
STATS1421 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not_Sure_Yet 2