AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

William Bonacci

MATH124 · MATH120 · TRIG · MATH110 · MATH135 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself math and can handle a rigid, lecture-driven class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMonotone LecturesLimited HelpHard TestsPolarizing ReviewsHomework Based
  • Most and weak help with questions.
  • and effective, but the overall experience is inconsistent.
  • Math courses feel difficult, and students report test struggles and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A looks difficult because students report , and needing to do homework without much help.

All evidence comes from in-person math reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The math content is challenging, and several students say unclear explanations made difficult subjects harder.

Only in-person reviews exist, and most difficulty evidence comes from MATH110, MATH120, and MATH135.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but reviews suggest showing up is important for following lectures and homework.

Only in-person reviews exist, and none clearly prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most students do not recommend him because , and bad test outcomes.

All recommendation evidence is in person and leans negative despite a few positive reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

because one student says correct answers could receive an F if solved differently than taught.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload seems moderate because but not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Teaching is often described as , and unhelpful, though a few students found his instruction strong.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person and mixed but mostly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

and tests, with tests driving much of the negative experience.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a polarizing math instructor, with several students calling him unhelpful or and a few praising his instruction.

Main concern

Students who need active help or .

What students said

“Refused to help and answer questions I had about the material (this happened multiple times.)”
MATH110
“ .”
MATH135
“Excellent instruction. You can do the .”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe difficult and rigid tests, but they do not .

Hard TestsRigid Solution MethodUnclear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policy.

Hard TestsRigid Solution Method
“Will give you an "F" on a test even if you get the right answers but do it differently than the way he taught it.”
MATH110
“I tried my hardest, but because i was doing so .”
MATH135
“ and lectures better.”
MATH110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“ and equations well enough, just alot of "got it? moving on" which i didnt like.”

📉 Difficulty Risk

28/100

“Hard as hell.”

⚖️

25/100

“Will give you an "F" on a test even if you get the right answers but do it differently than the way he taught it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Old, quiet, and monotonous.
  • Monotone voice. Bring drinks to class.
  • and concise.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I tried my hardest, but because i was doing so .
  • Easy class, but the teacher does not help at all.
  • Hard as hell.

Theme 3

🧩 About Help & Structure

  • Refused to help and answer questions I had about the material (this happened multiple times.)
  • Nice guy but he's not so unless it pertains exactly to what he's talking about.
  • As long as you show up and do the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Nine old reviews provide useful detail, but opinions are polarized and some comments are vague.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1104 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATH1241 review
MATH1351 review
TRIG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values