AI Rate Professor

Art

Iman Persons

Courses not reported · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself ceramics and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLow EngagementUnresponsiveSelf-Taught CeramicsGroup ProjectsSpotty Communication
  • Three of four reviews rate quality at 1 with .
  • Students and , and materials lean on YouTube.
  • One earlier review finds her chill with , but still calls the course self-driven.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Expectations are not extremely high and students report B grades, but .

Both formats show modest grades; online is harder because help never arrives.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Ceramics skill still takes studio time, but intellectual load is average when content is mostly demos and YouTube.

Online student rated difficulty higher due to zero support.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

and harshly graded; others say it is not required though studio time still matters.

; online marked attendance not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

and most students say they learned little and .

Negative consensus holds across the one online and majority of in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Few graded items and modest expectations, but and group work can still ding the grade.

Format shift

Sparse detail overall; .

Workload

Light

68/100

Projects are mostly studio or ; effort is time-on-clay more than homework volume.

Format shift

Similar light academic load online and in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students report little engagement, one-shot demos, YouTube materials, and ignored messages.

Format shift

; in-person still cites minimal teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ceramics reviews mostly , and group-only projects; one older review calls her chill and flexible.

Main concern

Weak instruction and communication leave skill growth to peers and self-practice.

What students said

“ridiculous attendance grading no engagement didn't learn anything”
4020
“she has little to no engagement to the class”
4020
“The course is self-driven.”
4020

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online section is described as pure self-teaching with and content pulled from YouTube.

Main concern

Complete non-responsiveness forces students to learn alone.

What students said

“She does not respond to but your own archive box.”
4020

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams; assessment seems project-based with little formal testing evidence.

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and .

Online

.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be prepared to teach yourself everything because all the materials she uses are from youtube.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 sparse reviews with consistent non-responsiveness themes; credibility rating: Low.

🔇 No Response Culture

24/100

“Be prepared to not have any response and .”

🙅

12/100

“didn't learn anything”

🛠️ Self-Driven Studio

68/100

“The course is self-driven.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • little to no engagement to the class
  • all the materials she uses are from youtube
  • shows a few demos which you need to pay attention to

Theme 2

📬 About Communication

  • inform us that she'll be absent on last day of the class

Theme 3

🎨 About Course Structure

  • all the
  • although it is hard to make good pieces if you aren't coming in

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews over a short span limit confidence, though the negative pattern is consistent enough to flag risk.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

40204 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2