AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Wendy Tu

MATH22722025F · MATH54 · MATH542655 · STAT102 · STATSMATH · MATH32 · MATH2547 · GEO32 · MA54 · 171 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
17.5%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if you care about your GPA or mental bandwidth; only consider with no other course options and full-time focus.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConfusing lecturesTough graderPop quizzesHeavy homeworkHarsh attendance
  • Most students describe lectures as .
  • and little makeup flexibility.
  • , and many report withdrawals or poor grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Most students report , and , so an A is rare without extreme effort.

Both formats describe harsh grading; and failed exams.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

22/100

Content , and tests that demand more than class coverage.

In-person and online both call the class overwhelming; stats and elementary algebra share the same complaint pattern.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

policies for absences and no makeups for sickness.

online mandatory meetings.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and the dominant advice is to choose any other professor.

Negative recommendation is consistent online and in person, with only a few outlier positive reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

, and little flexibility on makeups.

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

, and dense lectures consume large amounts of time.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students , and poorly connected to assessments.

Format shift

In-person criticism is denser; a few online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Exams and to mismatch test material.

Format shift

Exam-heavy structure mentioned mainly in in-person MATH54 and STAT reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative , and .

Main concern

lead many strong students to drop or fail.

What students said

“she doesn't know how to teach.”
MATH54
“Horrible. Class was full 30-40, by the end 16 of us left.”
STATSMATH
“RUN PLEASE... She bombards you information and expects you to retain it for her exams”
MATH54

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online sections draw similar complaints about rigid rules, heavy work, and an uncomfortable classroom tone.

Main concern

Mandatory meetings, passive-aggressive callouts, and .

What students said

“Take this class if you want to be humiliated and dread joining the .”
MATH54
“ .”
MATH32
“she goes through the lectures very fast and sometimes she doesn't know what she is talking about”
MATH54

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Frequent same-day pop quizzes and difficult exams that exceed lecture coverage make assessment high-risk.

Pop quizzesHard examsTest-heavyLittle makeup flexibility

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and zeros for absences with no makeups.

Pop quizzes after lectureExams worth large percentNo makeups when sick
“ so you better hope that you immediately understand everything she teaches.”
MA54
“ .”
MATH54
“if you were absent you would be penalized and ”
MATH54

Online

Online comments emphasize difficult quizzes, rigid rules, and stressful mandatory meetings.

Difficult quizzesMandatory meetingsRigid policies
“ .”
MATH54
“dread joining the .”
MATH54

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“RUN PLEASE... She bombards you information and expects you to retain it for her exams which btw are worth 55% of your grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (8 online, 42 in person), , and avoidance advice. Credibility rating: High.

🚨 Teaching Quality

24/100

“she doesn't know how to teach.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ .”

⚖️

16/100

“when you do small mistake she gave you 0 easily”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“She will steal all of your free time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures make no sense
  • hard to understand
  • and not understanding

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Most of the class ofcourse doesn't pass

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • Made a student cry
  • very condescending to students
  • passive aggressively call people out

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

171

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over several years with strong consensus on poor teaching clarity, harsh policies, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 519
3 out of 511
2 out of 527
1 out of 591

Course coverage

MATH5425 reviews
MATH329 reviews
MA546 reviews
STAT1024 reviews
GEO322 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH22722025F1 review
MATH25471 review
MATH5426551 review
STATSMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

5

B 4 · B- 1

C range

5

C 5

D range

3

D+ 1 · D 1 · D- 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

18

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 8 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2