AI Rate Professor

Design Technology

Jeffrey Adair

INTARC50 · INTER34 · INTARC34B · IARC15 · INTARC34 · INTARC30A · ARCH21 · ARC11 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
35.71%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you need the architecture skill set and ; skip short terms if possible.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy WorkloadUnclear InstructionsExpensive MaterialsDense Lectures
  • Many students call him a and unclear submission rules.
  • Lectures can be informative and sometimes funny, but emails and .
  • Supplies and materials are frequently described as costly and unused later, which frustrates budget-minded students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible if you follow every detail, but students say he is a and rarely gives full marks.

Online and ; winter/short terms make it worse.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Dense lectures, long CAD/rendering work, and beginner classes that still assume prior knowledge keep the content hard.

Online AutoCAD workloads feel especially long; in person adds materials and critique pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

and participation matters, with limited forgiveness for falling behind.

; evidence is mixed but leans strict.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

and frequent do-not-take warnings outweigh a smaller set of career-prep fans.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

; tiny details lower scores and full marks are rare.

Format shift

Consistent across online and in-person architecture courses.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of , and frequent projects.

Format shift

Winter online and short terms are repeatedly called too much work.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Some praise interesting lectures and humor, but , and unresponsive communication.

Format shift

A few online ARC11 fans like his videos; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Projects, renderings, and ; tests appear in some sections but work volume is the main grade driver.

Format shift

Online comments emphasize long assignment pipelines; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and heavy projects, with a minority praising humor and real career prep.

Main concern

Harsh critique culture and costly .

What students said

“Even though .I never got full marks on my assignments.This class costed me a lot.”
ARC11
“GUESS WORK, THE .”
INTARC34
“don't think you can get an easy A without working because you will have to work for it.”
INTARC34B

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online sections pile on dense , and messy assignment criteria.

Main concern

, and long weekly workloads that punish small mistakes.

What students said

“ ”
arch21
“all the and the .”
INTARC34
“The submission criteria is very often confusing, it appears he will say one thing to do but then after will immediately say the opposite”
IARC15

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment ; limited exam-policy detail beyond dense work and occasional quizzes.

Project HeavyPop QuizzesAssignment Detail Checks

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and peer critique rather than detailed exam software or open-book policies.

Project PresentationsStrict Project Standards
“Its shocking He allows the other students to judge your work and will encourage mean and almost abusive remarks about your work.”
INTARC34

Online

Online reviews highlight long AutoCAD assignments, confusing submission rules, and policies.

Long CAD WorkConfusing RubricsPop Quizzes
“The work itself is not that hard but is long Around 5 hours of online work or more.”
arch21
“Beware of pop quizzes”
IARC15

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have a hard time with time management and . But if you want a class that will prepare you for the career youre hoping to have take him.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews in design/architecture courses, . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“I think he's just bad at explaining things. In his lectures he talks to us as if we are kids.”

⚖️

28/100

“Adair is a . He is particular with how he wants things done.”

📚 Workload Reality

24/100

“it is a lot of work for 6 weeks for winter so be prepared”

👎 Recommendation

34/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lecture are VERY dense.
  • he tends to ramble on in his lectures
  • Solid lectures & notes to study is only saving grace

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he is a
  • I never got

Theme 3

💸 About Costs & Clarity

  • Be prepared to spend a LOTS of money on supplies you won't even use
  • the
  • GUESS WORK, THE

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews with split formats and mixed eras give a but limited recent depth.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 56
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ARC114 reviews
arch214 reviews
INTARC344 reviews
IARC153 reviews
INTARC30A1 review
Show 3 more courses
INTARC34B1 review
INTARC501 review
INTER341 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 6

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 1