AI Rate Professor

English

Chris Meeks

ENG2 · ENG1 · ENGL321 · ENGL1 · CREATIVEWRIT · ENGL2 · ENGLISH1 · ENG18 · ENG1814 · 93 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want real writing growth and will do the weekly reading and papers; skip if you want a low-effort English.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGives good feedbackGet ready to readCaringLots of homeworkImproves writing
  • Strong writing coach with detailed feedback that prepares students for later English courses.
  • Workload is reading- and paper-heavy; easy A only if you keep up with .
  • Nice and respected overall, though some find lectures long, off-topic, or not tech-smooth online.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic if and papers, but it is not free and ENG2 can grade strictly.

; some online sections call workload insane.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

, but volume of reading and writing raises the challenge.

; online difficulty ratings swing more widely.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Attendance is usually required and .

Online often requires live Zoom and camera; in-person takes roll frequently.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students praise writing growth and care; a minority dislike workload or teaching clarity.

; recent online is more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, yet some label him tough especially in ENG2.

Format shift

; a few report unclear instructions.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Frequent homework, many papers, and and praises.

Format shift

Some online entry sections feel especially overloaded.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Warm, feedback-rich writing mentor who improves skills, with occasional boring or unfocused lectures.

Format shift

; online tech and digressions draw criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and participation rather than timed exams.

Format shift

Consistent across formats with papers and weekly writing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

reading and papers that improve writing.

Main concern

and strict grading expectations for some ENG2 students.

What students said

“Easy A forsure as long as you READ and .”
ENG1
“He grades harshly but he always gives a .”
ENG2
“great professor! extremely easy A if you just do all the !”
ENGL1

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and sometimes heavy or unclear work.

Main concern

Camera requirements, off-topic Zoom time, and .

What students said

“ and highlights well your mistakes. His zoom meetings are pretty good and participative.”
ENGL1
“insane amount of work for an entry level class”
ENG1
“you must be online for every class and turn on your camera.”
ENG1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is paper- and .

Essays and research papersHomework-heavyFew traditional testsDiscussion-based

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; homework and attendance carry most weight.

Essay finalsResearch paperHomework-heavyDiscussion circles
“We wrote a research paper and .”
ENG1
“NO IN CLASS ESSAY!! .”
ENGL1

Online

Online work centers on papers, reading responses, and live participation; .

Writing assignmentsLive ZoomCamera required in one report
“you must be online for every class and turn on your camera.”
ENG1
“Do the work and you will earn a good grade in this class.”
ENG2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I can honestly say he made me a better writer. He truly wants to see his student do great!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting feedback, workload, and writing growth. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Hands down one of . .”

📝 Writing Growth

82/100

“my writing skills have improved significantly.”

📦 Workload

34/100

“insane amount of work for an entry level class”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“TRUST ME AND ! He is by far the easiest and coolest prof at SMC.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • sat in a circle and talked
  • a little boring but very knowledgeable
  • wastes time discussing topics not pertaining to the class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A forsure as long as you READ
  • . Just follow his instructions
  • He grades harshly but he always gives a
  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • such a nice teacher
  • genuinely cares about his students
  • Funny
  • sweetest teacher

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

93

Lifetime ratings

87/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years with and heavy writing load.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 559
4 out of 519
3 out of 55
2 out of 57
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG123 reviews
ENG29 reviews
ENGL17 reviews
ENGL25 reviews
CREATIVEWRIT1 review
Show 5 more courses
ENG181 review
ENG18141 review
ENGL3211 review
ENGLISH 11 review
ENGLISH11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 5 · A 19

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3