AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Kelly Hunter

CHEM11 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
61.54%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take her if you want a and will do the ; look elsewhere if you need dynamic lectures over exam-driven structure.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKind and caringExam-aligned homeworkLecture heavyTest heavyClear for some, textbook-read for others
  • Many students call her one of the better chem options for clear, student-centered teaching and fair exams.
  • Critics and tests weigh too heavily for the teaching style.
  • Homework and practice problems track exams closely; a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

As are attainable if and practice, but exams and .

Almost all evidence is in person; the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Chemistry content is standard college difficulty; good alignment of HW to exams softens the edge for prepared students.

In-person difficulty feels manageable with her resources; online .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

and advise not missing lecture, though a few list it as optional.

In-person often mandatory; the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

Majority recommend her for kindness and style.

; the lone online review would not enjoy taking her again.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Generally fair and sometimes generous, though , and tests strict.

Format shift

after a failed final; .

Workload

Moderate

54/100

Chapter homework around 1.5 hours plus labs and practice problems is steady but not crushing.

Format shift

In-person workload details are richer; .

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

Strong praise for and care sits next to critiques that lectures read the book or lack interaction.

Format shift

In-person has more Excellent-style praise; online is more negative on teaching style.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, labs, and practice that often mirror test items.

Format shift

Both formats call the course test heavy; in person notes a notecard except on the final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person splits between strong praise for , and kindness versus critiques of note-heavy style and .

Main concern

and heavily drive the grade.

What students said

“She's really good at explaining concepts and really wants to see her students pass.”
Chem11
“ so reasonable and relevant to what we learn”
1390
“ and it was hard to know what to study.”
12

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review calls her sweet but says lectures read the textbook and .

Main concern

for complex topics.

What students said

“I felt like she read the textbook word-for-word and so it was harder to understand complex topics.”
1390
“the .”
1390

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, often with a notecard allowed except on the final.

Notecard AllowedHW Matches TestsMultiple Choice And Free ResponseTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In and notes match exams; ; mix of MC and free response.

Notecard Allowed Except FinalHW Matches ExamsMultiple ChoiceFree Response
“You're allowed a notecard for .”
Chem11
“Notes and ”
12
“For the most difficult.”
1390

Online

Online review stresses heavily .

Test HeavyExam Focused
“No matter how much I studied for the class and did all the practice she provided, I did poorly on majority of the exams.”
1390
“the .”
1390

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easily the ... If I had put just 50% more effort I would have easily gotten an A in the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews (1 online, 12 in , and style split. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“She's really good at explaining concepts and really wants to see her students pass.”

📝

70/100

“Notes and ”

❤️ Student Support

78/100

“Hunter cares about her students. Go to her office hours.”

👎 Style Mismatch

40/100

“I dislike her teaching style. It heavily relies on notes, yet she does not provide lecture notes in canvas.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are amazing and the way she teaches is the in chemistry
  • she read the textbook word-for-word
  • It felt more like a YouTube review video than a lecture

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • similar
  • she was so ask her

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She's a really sweet and caring teacher
  • and understanding

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

13 reviews with recent detail and mixed but patterned opinions give medium-high confidence, limited by only one online review.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

13907 reviews
Chem114 reviews
122 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1