AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Peter Lee

G2805 · MATH02 · MATH85 · MATH2 · MATH20 · MATH07 · ALGEBRA · MAT31 · MATH84 · MATH84SUMMER · MATH31 · MATH21 · 217 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
23.53%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you already excel at math and notation errors.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTest heavyMinimal homeworkHarsh on notationPolarizing lectures
  • Grade is driven almost entirely by hard midterms and a .
  • Many students say tests are far harder.
  • A minority who keep up with his methods call him thorough, funny, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even strong students report losing points for notation and .

Online and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Pace, cumulative tests, and than peers.

Difficulty complaints dominate both formats; online sample is tiny.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Many say roll is infrequent, but missing lectures still hurts because if you hear them.

In-person comments ; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

and most detailed comments warn others away.

All three online reviews are negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

solution paths; wrong final answers often get zero.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

; the load is study pressure for frequent high-value tests instead.

Format shift

format.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Some call him thorough and funny, but far more say he yells, confuses, or fails to teach hard problems.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize poor Zoom teaching; in-person is split but negative overall.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

92/100

Multiple midterms and a ; homework and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and ; a smaller group praises thorough breakdowns and humor if they can handle the pressure.

Main concern

Syntax perfectionism and and fails.

What students said

“he takes off 8/10 points if you dont use an arrow or equal sign when showing the steps”
MATH02
“He is by far the . His way of teaching is very thorough... However, he is a .”
MATH2

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Sparse online reviews are strongly negative , and lack of accommodation.

Main concern

Online delivery is described as poorly adapted with little support if you fall behind.

What students said

“Does a two hour zoom on two pages of the textbook and then expects you to understand the entire rest of the material.”
MATH2
“Dont do it. .”
MATH07

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Short, high-stakes tests with strict step requirements and little recovery make the .

Test heavyFew graded itemsHarsh notationMulti-chapter examsPop quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and graded harshly on process and syntax with little partial credit.

5 midterms styleFinal large weightZero if answer wrongShow all steps exactly
“Whole class is based off of 4 midterms and a final exam worth 40% of your grade!”
MAT31
“he takes off 8/10 points if you dont use an arrow or equal sign when showing the steps”
MATH02

Online

Online comments focus on hard tests and .

Test heavyTough grader
“A and lots of outside help.”
G2805

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Worst!! Teacher!! Ever!!! He gives easy problems During lectures and insanely hard problems on the test.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (3 online, 47 in , and polarized teaching. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Overall Recommendation

24/100

“ .”

📝

16/100

“gives zero credit for work shown if the answer is wrong.”

🧪

92/100

“ and . Basically all midterms the whole semester!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he'll solve a problem on the board and . way too much yelling at 8:00 am.
  • His way of teaching is very thorough and he makes sure he breaks down every single problem to the details.
  • He talks a lot during lessons and only answers questions very few often.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you can spot subtle clues in and apply formulas flexibly, this class is doable. If you can't, you end up with a D.
  • Syntax is everything to him. He doesn't care about whether or not you got the right answer.
  • has on his notes and the sample tests.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support & Climate

  • he only accept his own solution.
  • Stay away from Prof. Lee. But if .
  • he's a sweet old man but

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

217

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over a long span show stable negative consensus on harsh testing and mixed teaching, with only a small loyal minority, so credibility is high.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 540
4 out of 520
3 out of 539
2 out of 536
1 out of 582

Course coverage

MATH8410 reviews
MATH029 reviews
MATH856 reviews
MATH075 reviews
MATH25 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MAT314 reviews
MATH313 reviews
MATH212 reviews
45011 review
841 review
ALGEBRA1 review
G28051 review
MATH201 review
MATH84SUMMER1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 8

B range

8

B+ 1 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

16

Drop/Withdrawal 8 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2