AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Hafedh Herichi

MATH8 · MATH3 · MATH2 · MATH15 · MATH07 · MATH13 · MATH11 · MATH50 · MATH7 · 86 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
82.81%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want to truly learn math and will put in serious weekly work; avoid if you need a light, automatic A.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAmazing LecturesCaring MentorProof HeavyLots of HomeworkWeekly Workshops
  • Deep, passionate lectures and workshops reward students who want real math mastery.
  • and ; easy-A seekers often struggle.
  • if they will practice daily and use office hours.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As are possible with daily practice and workshops, but exams and proofs demand serious effort, not minimal work.

In-person reviews stress rigor more; a few older .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Proof-heavy, concept-driven content and fast lectures make the material intellectually demanding.

Both formats describe challenge; .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

, but workshops and lectures are strongly encouraged for .

Online and as optional yet valuable.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

High take-again rate and repeated praise as one of .

Strong across formats; negatives cluster among students unprepared for workload.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Many call him fair with partial credit and , while others say he docks small details harshly.

Format shift

In-person comments mix fair and ; online is often described as fair.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and dense notes create a high weekly load.

Format shift

; online still reports lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students repeatedly , and genuine care.

Format shift

; a minority find lectures too fast or proof-heavy.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

74/100

Exams drive the grade, supported by heavy homework and .

Format shift

Consistent across formats.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person courses feature dense , and supportive workshops with high recommendation among committed students.

Main concern

Insane homework volume and .

What students said

“If you're looking for a math class with zero effort and an automatic A, .”
MATH13
“The amount of work he gives in INSANE.”
MATH11
“He is the and the .”
MATH2

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online sections still emphasize hard work and strong lectures; students praise accessibility and note no Proctorio on some courses.

Main concern

Fast pace and heavy practice still required; not a free online A for everyone.

What students said

“I had to work very hard to earn an A, be careful he is not easy !”
MATH11
“He doesnt ”
MATH2
“His lectures are amazing and and weekly workshops.”
MATH11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are rigorous and concept- or proof-focused; online reports of no Proctorio improve friendliness slightly.

Proof HeavyStudy GuidesWorkshop ProblemsNo Proctorio (Online)Concept Oriented

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lecture or workshop problems; timed and challenging with limited replacement policies.

Proof HeavyTimed ExamsLecture ExamplesNo Lowest Exam Drop (often)
“The . I was not ready for the amount of rigorous proofs”
MATH13
“Gives you an hour and twenty minutes to do 18 problems.”
MATH11
“ but there are never curveballs and he is a .”
MATH13

Online

Online students report hard work for As, helpful workshops, and at least some courses without Proctorio.

No ProctorioWorkshop SupportHard but Fair
“He doesnt ”
MATH2
“I had to work very hard to earn an A, be careful he is not easy !”
MATH11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're looking for a really smart professor who teaches well and cares about his students while making sure they understand advanced and theoretical topics, Herichi is one of the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (6 online, 44 in person), highlighting mastery-focused teaching versus heavy workload. Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Excellence

88/100

“He is the and the .”

💪 Workload Reality

28/100

“The amount of work he gives in INSANE.”

👍 Strong Recommendation

86/100

“If ! Truly an inspiration and made my life easier.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great lectures, very enthusiastic about teaching

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • No curveballs. You must put in the work, but you will be rewarded
  • An A is definitely possible with effort
  • if you're not good at math or can't handle a massive workload

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • passionate, genuine, and really cares about students
  • Always available and willing to help you
  • He changed my mind!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

86

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many math courses and years show strong consistency on teaching quality, rigor, and workload.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 562
4 out of 511
3 out of 55
2 out of 55
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1119 reviews
MATH1311 reviews
MATH26 reviews
MATH154 reviews
MATH34 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH072 reviews
MATH82 reviews
MATH501 review
MATH71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 4 · A 19 · A- 1

B range

10

B+ 2 · B 7 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

13

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 4