AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Aileen Huang

ACCTG2 · ACTGFO76 · ACCTG02 · ACC2 · ACTGF076 · ACC202 · ACCT2 · ACCT02 · AC2 · ACCTG9 · ACCT1226 · 54 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
94.12%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you will stay on the weekly schedule; she rewards consistent work and asks for help.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear structureCareer-minded mentoringExtra credit bufferOpen-book friendly quizzesAccessible outside class
  • Strong recommendation for Accounting 2 with and lots of support.
  • Fair, often lenient path to A if , and use .
  • , but many still call her the goldilocks accounting pick.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

77/100

Keeping up with weekly work plus and As for engaged students.

Online ethics and ACCT2 often sound easier; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

Accounting concepts still need practice and and support make the .

Both formats call content manageable with effort; .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

, but showing up or using Zoom and office hours clearly helps learning.

Online is usually flexible; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

and goldilocks professor framing.

Recommendation is strong online and in person despite a minority of .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

, and grade bumps for students who complete the work.

Format shift

Online open-book quizzes and EC appear often; in-person still called fair if effort is visible.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

, and discussions add up, especially in accelerated or multi-chapter weeks.

Format shift

Online case discussions and publisher HW can feel time-consuming; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

, and genuine care dominate recent student stories.

Format shift

In-person mentoring shines; older online .

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

and quizzes combine with midterms, finals, and sometimes a project or discussions.

Format shift

Online emphasizes HW, quizzes, and open-book exams; and weekly quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person lectures and mentoring stand out; , and a doable A with steady work.

Main concern

Accelerated or heavy terms still demand serious weekly study; not a no-effort free A for everyone.

What students said

“ . I love her lectures and she helps out during office hours.”
ACCT2
“does a very good job of explaining complicated concepts... grades leniently.”
AC2
“I felt like I had to depend on self-studying to understand the concepts... I'd take Accounting 2 with someone else.”
ACCTG02

Remote format

Online

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online , and lecture videos with generally fair grading and open-note style tests.

Main concern

Some terms feel self-taught with .

What students said

“The lecture videos were really helping in understanding concepts that were difficult to grasp. !”
ACCT2
“ and she .”
ACCTG9
“The , and grading takes so long you have no idea if you're on the right track.”
ACC202

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Many reviews describe open-book or open-note quizzes and .

Open book testsOpen notes quizzesMultiple attempts sometimesExtra credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

79/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and projects; reviews do not clearly prove webcam proctoring.

Weekly quizzesMidterm and finalGroup project sometimes
“You'll have a lot of fun in her class, esp on the project... grasp the concepts in order to prepare for the midterm and final.”
ACCT2
“Weekly quizzes (not hard if you study) and , and .”
ACCT2

Online

Online students frequently report open-book or open-notes quizzes and and .

Open bookOpen notesDrops lowest scoresMultiple quiz attempts
“ and she .”
ACCTG9
“Exams and . Overall, easy A unless you don't do anything.”
ACCTG9
“Gives 2 attempts for your quizzes. .”
ACCTG9

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is the goldilocks professor of accounting at SMC. Not too hard and not too easy, just right.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting structure, support, open assessments, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ . I love her lectures and she helps out during office hours.”

📘

77/100

“As long as you keep up with the work its an easy A.”

💬 Support Outside Class

90/100

“Professor Huang would email me back a very detailed breakdown of any question I had.”

⚠️

40/100

“I ended up teaching myself most of the material. ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's great at explaining complicated concepts and if you reach out for help.
  • She makes accounting less like a drag.
  • She is the absolute most professional and educated professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • if you keep up with the work.
  • Take this class if you want a guaranteed A.
  • . I felt like I had to depend on self-studying.

Theme 3

💼 About Career Mentoring

  • She took the time to help me with my UC application.
  • She gave me great career advice and when I emailed she replied right away.
  • she would share her life experience working as a accountant in some big companies.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

54

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across online and and detailed grade and workload notes.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 541
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ACCT216 reviews
ACCTG212 reviews
AC24 reviews
ACC24 reviews
ACCTG94 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ACC2022 reviews
ACCT022 reviews
ACCTG022 reviews
10261 review
ACCT12261 review
ACTGF0761 review
ACTGFO761 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

36 reported outcomes

A range

29

A+ 14 · A 15

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1