AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jilbert Gharamanians

MATH3 · MATH54 · MATH21 · MATH542982 · MATH02 · MATH2 · MATH2682 · MATH20 · MATH18 · MATH26 · MATH7 · 72 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
36.84%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you already have a strong math foundation and and office hours.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing LecturerHeavy HomeworkFast PacedCaring PersonalitySelf Teach Required
  • Personality is widely seen as kind and willing to help, but lecture clarity is highly disputed.
  • and .
  • Many students say and stay on top of a fast pace to survive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A usually requires , and using office hours; many still get Cs or drop.

Evidence is mostly in person; online and self-teaching.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Pace , and weaker math students repeatedly report having to self-teach.

Both formats mention fast lectures and ; calc and stats draw the harshest complaints.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and participation or .

Online and in as required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

and many students urge finding another professor despite his kindness.

; a minority of online and in-person fans strongly defend him.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

, and few grade updates make grades feel harsh and unpredictable.

Format shift

Both ; online adds stories of format penalties and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

and frequent quizzes or tests consume most of students' time.

Format shift

In person and .

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Students split between inspiring accessible mentor and .

Format shift

Online has both glowing and scathing extremes; in person leans more critical on lecture quality.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Exams and a while but lower weight.

Format shift

Some older .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person he is often called a and difficult tests, but weak or disorganized lectures for many students.

Main concern

, and test-heavy weighting cause drops and stress.

What students said

“Truly a if you show up and put in the work.”
Math7
“Please do not take this professor, you will definitely regret it, you won't learn anything from his lectures”
MATH54
“He assigns LOADS of .”
MATH54

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are sharply split, with some finding him inspiring and , and unhelpful.

Main concern

, and inconsistent instructions frustrate online students.

What students said

“ as your math teacher”
MATH54
“As someone who has struggled with math in the as a professor.”
MATH54
“No joke this professor is lightening fast, but is very engaging, crystal clear in what needs to be understood”
MATH2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often hard and long, sometimes similar to quizzes or .

Test HeavyPop QuizzesTake-Home Quiz ComponentsHomework-Similar ExamsLong Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

guides or quizzes, with pop quizzes and long free-response work.

Pop QuizzesStudy Guide Similar to ExamTake-Home Free ResponseLong Tests
“Study guide is very similar to the exam but he gives very difficult questions.”
Math7
“ booster.”
MATH54

Online

Online comments emphasize hard confusing tests that .

Hard TestsTests Unlike HomeworkHeavy Exam Weight
“The and confusing and aren't like the homework.”
MATH54
“randomly got dropped because I did not use the correct format for the exam.”
MATH54

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a good guy but not a good professor. very hard to understand. you have to teach yourself almost everything. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 math reviews with polarized praise and criticism across online and in-person formats. Credibility rating: High.

🤝 Personality vs Teaching

45/100

“Gharamanians is a nice guy and obviously cares for his students, but he just isn't that good a teacher.”

📚

28/100

“He assigns LOADS of .”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

36/100

“if you have to take calc 1 avoid him and Nestler”

✨ Fan Experience

70/100

“He made me realize that I am capable of doing math! Thank you, prof!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • you have to teach yourself almost everything
  • and he doesnt really teach well.
  • lightening fast, but

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Only those who managed .
  • do the hw!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Truly a caring professor
  • He's pretty dope. He cares about his students
  • sincerely wants everyone to pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

72

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years show a and weak lecture clarity, supporting high confidence.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 59
3 out of 512
2 out of 511
1 out of 517

Course coverage

MATH5426 reviews
MATH215 reviews
Math74 reviews
MATH23 reviews
MATH33 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH182 reviews
MATH26822 reviews
0071 review
MATH021 review
MATH201 review
MATH261 review
MATH5429821 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 8

B range

7

B+ 1 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

6

C 6

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

17

Audit/No Grade 2 · Drop/Withdrawal 8 · Incomplete 3 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2