AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Thomas Harjuno

MATHMATH · MATH21 · MATH20 · MATH2 · MATH31 · MATH32 · MATH26 · MATH7 · MAT21 · 59 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
23.08%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already love math, will attend every day, and accept a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerBrutal GraderTest-Heavy GauntletMandatory AttendanceGPA RiskPast Tests Available
  • and drive almost the entire grade.
  • and drop risks for absences.
  • A minority praise real learning and past-test prep; most warn about GPA damage.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Even strong students report Bs and Cs from picky deductions and .

Online reviews show near-impossible As; but still very hard to earn an A.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Fast lectures, dense material, and exams much harder than class examples make content intellectually brutal.

Both formats describe extreme difficulty; online adds overwhelming lecture-hour loads.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Skip-class-you-wont-pass tags and reports of being dropped for absences dominate.

; online still requires massive weekly lecture watching.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Only about 23 percent would take again, with many explicit stay-away warnings about GPA harm.

Both online reviews are strongly negative; in-person is polarized but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

; minor messiness or small mistakes can tank letter grades.

Format shift

Online and .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Daily quizzes, optional-but-needed homework, and .

Format shift

Online uniquely adds about 10 hours of lecture video per week.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Knows the material and helps serious students, yet many call .

Format shift

In-person is split love-hate; online teaching experience is rated poorly.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Nearly everything rides on several hard tests and a .

Format shift

; in-person adds frequent quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and exam performance far above lecture examples, with polarizing views on fairness.

Main concern

Harsh grading on minor mistakes and .

What students said

“He is the ”
MATH20
“STAY AWAY!!! ... Wants you to fail. Most people got C!!!!!!”
MATH26
“Thomas is an excellent instructor and will challenge you to learn and grow.”
MATH31

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and extremely hard exams with inconsistent point cuts.

Main concern

Most of the class fails or withdraws under 10-plus hour weekly lecture loads and brutal tests.

What students said

“by the end, all dropped except 11, & only two got a B or above.”
MATH2
“ !! ”
MATH2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are the course and routinely harder than homework or board examples, with .

Tests Much Harder Than LecturesPast Tests PostedTough Grader On Minor ErrorsPop QuizzesNo Soft Curves Mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as study tools yet still feel much harder than lectures, with daily quiz pressure.

Past Exams On WebsiteDaily QuizzesHarder Than Lecture ExamplesCheat Sheets Sometimes Allowed
“he expects you to solve 20 times harder question than he go over in class.”
MATH20
“Cheat sheets are allowed for tests and there are a handful of class activities.”
MATH2

Online

and only a few students earn B or above.

Test Only GradingVery Difficult ExamsInconsistent Point Deductions
“the tests are incredibly difficult & point deduction isn't consistent among students.”
MATH2
“ and will mark you down even if its a little messy.”
MATH2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“STAY AWAY!!! ... Most people got C!!!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews with only 2 , and polarized respect. Credibility rating: High.

📉 GPA Damage Risk

18/100

“I'm still salty that it ruined my 4.0.”

🧪

22/100

“questions are so difficult and unlike anything learned in .”

🔥 Hardcore Learning Payoff

48/100

“You genuinely learn in his class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures make sense and are easy to follow
  • doesn't care about student concerns
  • funny, personable, strict

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Most people got C!!!!!!

Theme 3

⏰

  • ?
  • Total of 10 hours of lecture to watch per week
  • Daily quizzes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

59

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years with and test-heavy themes, despite polarized affection, support high credibility.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 59
3 out of 59
2 out of 52
1 out of 515

Course coverage

MATH3110 reviews
MATH218 reviews
MATH268 reviews
MATH27 reviews
MATH207 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH323 reviews
math73 reviews
MATHMATH3 reviews
MAT211 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 5

C range

6

C 6

D range

2

D+ 2

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 3