AI Rate Professor

Administration Of Justice

Lisa Junghahn

ADJ01 · ADJ101 · ADJUS2 · ADJUS1 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
88%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you will actually read and engage; skip if you want a no-work AJ elective.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMust read textbookClear grading and feedbackExtra credit heavyOpen-book friendly examsPassionate AJ instructor
  • Do the reading and apply yourself and most students report a strong chance at an A.
  • , and offers substantial .
  • A minority of reviews flag toughness, high expectations, or interpersonal friction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Many students say an A is very achievable with reading, assignments, and , not free without work.

Online reviews more often call it Easy A with open-book work; in person still high grades but stricter tone.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Material is approachable for non-majors, but volume of .

; online adds modules and discussions.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

, though some online or hybrid-style notes say no.

In-person reviews lean mandatory and participation-heavy; online is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students call her a top SMC professor for clarity, care, and real learning when you do the work.

Strong praise in both formats with a few sharp online and in-person outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and EC help, but and paragraph-length answers appear often.

Format shift

Online students emphasize open book and EC; in-person students note tougher expectations.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

Weekly reading, discussions, modules, papers, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize textbook modules and papers more explicitly.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students , and genuine care for learning.

Format shift

Both formats rate teaching highly outside a small set of hostile outliers.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of exams, discussions, textbook modules, and .

Format shift

Online evidence details 4 exams, discussions, modules, and a paper most clearly.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person classes are lecture- and , and strong student support.

Main concern

Tough expectations on short answers and participation if you stay passive.

What students said

“She is an engaging and knowledgeable professor who clearly cares about student learning.”
ADJ01
“BUT YOU HAVE TO READ”
ADJUS2
“Unrealistic expectations toward students, never satisfied with the work handed to her.”
ADJ01

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections reward reading, discussions, modules, and and EC.

Main concern

and occasional reports of harsh tone or overload.

What students said

“This class is a guaranteed A if you actually apply yourself.”
ADJUS1
“Almost all her assignments and and really easy. , and lots of opportunities!!”
ADJUS1
“Very rude . And discriminatory. .”
ADJ101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

moderate length and plentiful EC paths.

Open bookTimed examsMultiple choice and short answerExtra creditTextbook-based tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and discussion-linked; at least one review says short answers need paragraph-length responses.

Timed examsShort-answer depthDiscussion-linked testsClear grading criteria
“ and similar to the discussion posts.”
ADJUS1
“on the questions on a exams you have to write at least 1 ”
ADJ01

Online

Online students report multiple-choice and discussions and modules.

Open bookFour examsShort answersWeekly discussionsMcGraw Hill modules
“ and short answers, ~15 questions but isnt too difficult.”
ADJUS2
“ and and really easy.”
ADJUS1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Do the work, show effort, don't rely on AI, read, and you'll be fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews across online and reading load. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Proffesor Lisa is the . She has an excellent way of explaining concepts and has no problem keeping the class engadged.”

📚 Reading Load

45/100

“you MUST read the textbook and understand the concepts to pass.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“The best professor at SMC, she will make sure you are learning in this class and .”

🎁

85/100

“she offers over 50 points of in the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Her lectures are funny and provide a .
  • She thrives on participation.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class is a guaranteed A if you actually apply yourself.
  • You got to work hard to get an A in her class.
  • and similar to the discussion posts.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • Very rude . And discriminatory. .
  • Case overload!!! We are not attorneys!!
  • Unrealistic expectations toward students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

25 recent and detailed reviews split almost evenly online and in person with consistent main themes.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ADJUS212 reviews
ADJUS16 reviews
ADJ015 reviews
ADJ1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 8 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values