Odemaris Valdivia

CIS1428 · ACCT31A · CIS38 · AACTG35 · ACCT31AB · CIS30 · CIS1 · CIS35 · CIS30EXCEL · CIS60B · EXCEL31 · CIS36P · CAOT078 · ACCTG31A · ACCOUNTING31A · CIS64 · ACCT31B · ACCT031 · CAOT78 · CIS60BONLINE · 129 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 27/100
RMP rating: 2.0/5
Take again: 22.22%
Difficulty: 3.2

The decision

if you can reverse-engineer messy instructions on your own; many students find the experience frustrating despite workable grades.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear InstructionsTough GraderSlow ResponsesSelf-Taught SoftwareFormatting Stickler

Most complaints center on unclear or typo-filled instructions that .
Software classes are largely self-taught from the book, with and .
A minority of students praise caring support, , and certification help when directions click.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Many students finish with A or B if they carefully follow every step, but tiny formatting misses or .

Online reviews mention and A grades more often; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

58/100

Material is often basic Excel or software walkthrough work, but poor instructions make simple tasks feel harder than they are.

Both formats say content is not advanced; online comments stress book-following and typos.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Some sections require attendance or , while many online sections do not track class meetings.

; several in-person and online comments say participation or deadlines are strict.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

26/100

Overall recommendation is low because and harsh tone outweigh the minority of glowing reviews.

Online volume is more negative; a smaller set of positive in-person and online fans still exists.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

She docks heavily for formatting and missed steps, sometimes awarding zero for minor date or layout errors.

Format shift

Strict formatting penalties appear in both formats; a few .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Weekly software projects and and can pile up in short terms, but content itself is not always deep.

Format shift

Online accelerated sections feel heavier; .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Many students say she does not really teach and and unclear prompts.

Format shift

Online complaints dominate; some students who use office hours or Zoom report a much better experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and software exercises more than high-stakes sit-down exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize projects and assignments over traditional exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews also , and rude or late feedback, with a few long-term fans.

Main concern

Confusing requirements and .

What students said

“ABSOLUTELY AWFUL. The class shouldn't be that hard, but is made a million times more difficult by her crappy instructions”
ACCT31A

“You will spend most of the time on the wants”
ACCT31B

“ .”
ACCT31AB

Remote format

Online

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online Excel, QuickBooks, and design courses are book-driven with , and .

Main concern

and slow, sometimes harsh feedback that makes success feel random.

What students said

“her instructions for ”
CIS35

“Her so you end up doing the wrong thing.”
ACCT31B

“She give a ton of so it's practically impossible to get anything lower than an A.”
ACCT31A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly project and ; when exams appear, students struggle more with .

Project BasedOnline ExamsPractice TestsStep-by-Step Assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention exams and policies.

ExamsLate GradingProject Heavy

“It took her 1 day short of 3 weeks to grade the .”
ACCT31B

Online

Online reviews mainly discuss project submissions and occasional exams with confusing .

ProjectsConfusing Exam WordingRetakeable Quizzes in Some Courses

“ .”
CIS64

“You will spend most of the time on the wants”
ACCT31B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Her so you end up doing the "wrong" thing. Then she docks you points for that, even though you did what was instructed.”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, balancing majority instruction complaints with minority praise. Credibility rating: High.

📝

30/100

“Her so you end up doing the "wrong" thing.”

⚖️ Strict Formatting Grades

32/100

“She gave me 0/40 just because I put the wrong date on a document.”

💻

30/100

“She does not teach anything.. just collect some documents and provide you.”

🌟 Polarized Support

48/100

“She was an steps in assignments (even including screenshots”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

She Doesn't even bother to teach anything herself, she just says to follow exercises in a book.
Any .
she really is an excellent teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

She gave me 0/40 just because I put the wrong date on a document.
You can work for two hours on a class project and receive 0 points.
She give a ton of so it's practically impossible to get anything lower than an A.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

and email.
She is SO RUDE.
Bad communicator.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

129

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with a stable majority theme of positive outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518

4 out of 56

3 out of 511

2 out of 524

1 out of 570

Course coverage

CIS3513 reviews

ACCT31A8 reviews

ACCT31B4 reviews

ACCT0313 reviews

CIS30EXCEL3 reviews

Show 15 more courses

ACCOUNTING31A2 reviews

ACCTG31A2 reviews

CIS382 reviews

CIS60BONLINE2 reviews

AACTG351 review

ACCT31AB1 review

CAOT0781 review

CAOT781 review

CIS11 review

CIS14281 review

CIS301 review

CIS36P1 review

CIS60B1 review

CIS641 review

EXCEL311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 4 · A 15 · A- 1

B range

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

C 1

D range

D 2

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 9 · Rather not say 1

Odemaris Valdivia

x x if you can reverse-engineer messy instructions on your own; many students find the experience frustrating despite workable grades.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Beginner

Varies

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

📝 x x

⚖️ Strict Formatting Grades

💻 x x

🌟 Polarized Support

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

💬 About Communication

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you can reverse-engineer messy instructions on your own; many students find the experience frustrating despite workable grades.

📝

💻