AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Barbara Bronie

MATH54 · M21 · ALGEB031 · MATH81 · MATH2618 · MATH031 · MATH84 · MATH18 · MATH31 · MATH2938 · MATH26 · MATH21 · 235 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
60.78%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you will attend every class, grind homework, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTest HeavyHard of HearingTextbook LecturesCaring When You Show UpHeavy Homework
  • .
  • some call her a foundation-builder; others cannot follow her lectures or writing.
  • Hearing issues, fast pace, and illegible board work are repeated barriers.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

As are possible with constant study and , but and many report C, D, or drops.

Evidence is mostly in-person; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Math content plus fast lectures and intro levels.

In-person complaints about pace and clarity dominate; online is similar but thinner.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Skip class and you miss rapid board notes and test prep; as essential.

Both formats stress showing up; if .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

About six in ; recommendations depend on whether students can handle her style and self-study.

In-person is highly split; limited online reviews also split positive and drop-related.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Tough grader tags and .

Format shift

Online and .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of and frequent exams, even when HW is barely collected.

Format shift

Consistent across formats.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Long-time instructor with strong care and handouts for some, and unreadable lectures for many others.

Format shift

In-person has more severe communication and handwriting critiques.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Weekly or frequent tests and ; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

caring and resource-rich for engaged students, unreadable and .

Main concern

Illegible cursive notes, hearing issues, and .

What students said

“the whole entire 2 hours of class is just her writing the math problems in an UNREADABLE CURSIVE!!!also has TROUBLE HEARING”
MATH54
“ similar to the ones on the exam! She genuinely really cares.”
MATH18
“She doesn't teach, just copies from the textbook. Has illegible handwriting and refuses to fix it.”
MATH26

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Sparse online feedback is mixed; and limited support.

Main concern

and uneven help.

What students said

“Ms. Bronie cares about the students and wants them to succeed. She always made time to make sure that everyone understood.”
ALGEB031
“Whole grade is based on tests and .”
ALGEB031
“She just lectures from the textbook without much extra help.”
MATH26

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Frequent in-class style testing with practice keys; reviews do not .

Weekly TestsCumulative ExamsPractice TestsStudy Guides

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and cumulative finals with board-based lectures.

Weekly TestsPractice ExamsCumulative FinalsChalkboard Lectures
“Make sure to be prepared for and trust me, they're not easy at all.”
m21
“ similar to the ones on the exam!”
MATH18

Online

Online reviews describe lecture-from-book style and .

Test HeavyCumulative TestsHomework Low Weight
“Whole grade is based on tests and .”
ALGEB031
“FYI.. . !”
MATH031

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you come here with a winning attitude and a desire to learn you will find yourself one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting test weight, lecture clarity, and care versus frustration. Credibility rating: High.

📊

78/100

“Your grade depends on the grade.”

🦻 Communication Barriers

30/100

“Hard of hearing and is always asking for you to speak up. Has illegible handwriting and refuses to fix it.”

❤️ Cares If You Try

70/100

“She does everything to help students who want help.”

⚠️ Polarizing Outcomes

40/100

“Take this professor if you want to cook your gpa. She is probably the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she lectures & assigns hw STRAIGHT outta the textbook
  • She provides a lot of handouts as resources

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do the work, attend class, study as expected with any math class, and you will do well
  • DO NOT PICK HER AS PROFESSOR YOU WILL FAIL EVEN IF YOU ARE LEARNING
  • As long as you do that, its an easy A.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Logistics

  • ,so keep track yourself!
  • She also only uses a chalkboard
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

235

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with , and lecture clarity yield high confidence despite polarization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5137
4 out of 527
3 out of 520
2 out of 514
1 out of 537

Course coverage

MATH3113 reviews
MATH0317 reviews
MATH184 reviews
Math214 reviews
MATH264 reviews
Show 9 more courses
m213 reviews
MATH26183 reviews
MATH813 reviews
MATH843 reviews
ALGEB0312 reviews
26591 review
32281 review
MATH29381 review
MATH541 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 6 · A 8

B range

8

B+ 1 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

7

C+ 1 · C 6

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1