AI Rate Professor

English

Steve Overall

ENG2 · ENG1 · ENG02 · ENGLISH2 · ENGLI1 · ENGL11 · ENG1111 · ENG101 · ENGL2 · ENGL1974 · ENGLISH1 · 98 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
40.63%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Avoid unless and and a confusing external platform.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLate gradingThird-party websiteEssay-heavyBoring lecturesInconsistent feedback
  • Biggest complaint is delayed grading on a clunky third-party site with little Canvas use
  • Classes revolve around a few major essays and
  • Personality ranges from sweet and patient to defensive, but many call lectures monotone and slow

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Completing steps and essays can yield A or B, but tough essay grading, vague criteria, and .

Online students emphasize late ungraded rewrites; pace.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is not conceptually brutal, but , and multiple essays create steady friction.

Both formats call the class slow and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Many sections require attendance, and some students report .

Online often requires show-up; in-person tags and comments .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Would-take-again sits near 41% and and late grading.

; recent online and in-person reviews are sharply negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Frequent tough-grader tags, , and late grading leave little room to recover.

Format shift

; some in-person older reviews allowed rewrites.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and constant reading or homework assignments stack up across the term.

Format shift

Online winter and summer intensives feel essay-every-week heavy; .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Knowledge of literature is sometimes praised, but engagement, clarity, organization, and .

Format shift

A minority of students find him sweet and useful; the dominant modern tone is boring and poorly run.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Final grades hinge on a feeling secondary or ungraded for months.

Format shift

Both formats center 2-4 essays as the real grade.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some find him patient and easy if you follow steps, , and slow to grade.

Main concern

Class time often feels useless or high-school slow while .

What students said

“He is probably one of the entire life.”
ENGL2
“He waited till the last week of the semester to grade everything”
ENG02
“This class is an easy A if you complete the work. Not hard, but consists of a lot of writing along with .”
ENG1

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

weeks late, and weak email response.

Main concern

You often do not know your grade until after the term ends.

What students said

“ .”
ENG02
“We basically had an , and he did not grade until a week after semester ended.”
ENG2
“You have to use 3rd party site that is just a worse Canvas.”
ENG02

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is essay-driven rather than proctored exams; risk .

Essay midterms and finalsMultiple major papersResearch pointsThird-party submission siteLittle mid-semester feedback

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and research homework, sometimes with an in-class final, and little Canvas transparency.

3-4 essaysIn-class final sometimesResearch homeworkNo Canvas gradebook
“No rough drafts on essays. ”
ENG02
“you had to do 3 essays and .”
ENG2

Online

Online work is submitted on a third-party site with several essays deciding the grade and .

Third-party website2-4 essaysLate gradingRewrite sometimes offered but not graded
“Your grade is .”
ENG02
“He offered us a chance to rewrite our first writing project, which I took, and then he ”
ENG02

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning online and issues, and essay weight. Credibility rating: High.

⏱️

28/100

“we are a month and some change from the end of the semester and he hasn't graded A SINGLE ASSIGNMENT!”

🌐 Third-Party Site Pain

30/100

“He uses a horrible and non user-friendly third party website”

📝 Essay-Only Stakes

78/100

“Your grade is .”

😴 Lecture Energy

35/100

“So boring its literally painful to be in class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are very boring
  • spends a lot of engaging
  • He's not a bad teacher, just extremely boring

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy A if you complete the work
  • you never know what is your grade

Theme 3

💻 About Course Logistics

  • uses a third-party website, so you do

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

98

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years show a durable pattern of essay weight, platform friction, boredom, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 516
3 out of 523
2 out of 521
1 out of 521

Course coverage

ENG0217 reviews
ENG111 reviews
ENG27 reviews
ENGLISH24 reviews
ENGL23 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENGLISH12 reviews
40341 review
ENG1011 review
ENG11111 review
ENGL111 review
ENGL19741 review
ENGLI11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 2 · A 11 · A- 2

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 1