AI Rate Professor

English

Jeffrey Sosner

ENGLISH8 · ENGLISH1 · ENG01 · ENGL2 · 1988ENGL1 · ENGLI4146 · ENGL4163 · ENG2 · ENG1 · B · ENG4163 · ENGLI1 · ENGL01 · ENGL4148 · ENGLISH2 · ENG1858 · ENGL1 · ENG1835 · ENG4007 · 49 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a with clear feedback.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGives great essay feedbackCaring and funnyOptional rough draftsClear expectationsHistory-heavy readings
  • Students praise clear criteria, detailed essay feedback, and revision chances.
  • Class is enjoyable and supportive, though .
  • An A takes real writing effort, but a solid grade is very reachable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Rough drafts and revisions make a strong grade realistic, but and need real work.

Most evidence is in person; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Content is manageable with reading and feedback, though some units feel history-heavy.

In-person reviews dominate and call the class fun with solid reading load.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

and participation, but not always rigid.

; in person more often lists attendance as required.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

About 83 percent would take again and most call him one of the best English options at SMC.

Nearly all positive energy is from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

He can be picky on essays but offers revisions, examples, and .

Format shift

A ; most praise fairness and help.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Expect several essays, readings, and a way.

Format shift

Workload description is consistent across formats.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students repeatedly call him funny, passionate, accessible, and excellent at improving writing.

Format shift

In-person evidence is extensive; online is sparse but still strongly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

; exams and quizzes matter less.

Format shift

Some in-person sections also use a book-based midterm and final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students repeatedly praise fun lectures, rough-draft help, and real writing improvement.

Main concern

Some dislike the history-focused textbook and want more pure writing time.

What students said

“if you turn in the for you.”
ENG2
“He is the best professor at SMC. He loves teaching and .”
ENGLISH2

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Limited online feedback , and .

Main concern

, but expectations are stated upfront.

What students said

“He cares very much, he wants you to pass, he is a , although what is expected of you is clear from the beginning.”
ENG1
“he is truly passionate about his work and makes the class fun.”
1988ENGL1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly writing with clear rubrics; .

Essay-focused gradingOptional rough draftsBook-based midterm/finalIn-class essay option

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final tied to the assigned book.

Three essays commonMidterm and final on readingsRevision opportunities
“ , and . He let's you revise your essays to improve your scores”
ENGLISH1

Online

Online reviews emphasize clear assignment criteria more than proctored exams.

Clear assignment expectationsEssay feedback focus
“what is expected of you is clear from the beginning and if you do what is on the .”
ENG1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is the best professor at SMC. He loves teaching and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 49 reviews, highlighting key themes in feedback, essay support, and classroom energy. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Professor Sosner's passion for teaching literature pours out of this man in every class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“If you're going to take an English class, he is the perfect professor.”

📝 Feedback Support

86/100

“if you turn in the for you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His Lectures are not heavy or boring. They are actually really fun.
  • He tells a ton of jokes, so it makes class times fun
  • He is extremely passionate and responsible.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This is no easy A, but if you are willing to think critically about what you read, then you will be fine.
  • It's easy to get a B, but you have to work for an A.
  • He is a hard but

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Professor Sosner is a remarkable professor who wants to see his students excel.
  • he managed to narrow things down to help me and the others out.
  • Love Prof Sosner. Amazing human being.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

49

Recent reviews read by the AI

49

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-nine reviews over many years are strongly consistent on feedback quality and recommendation, with only a small online sample.

Inside 49 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 535
4 out of 510
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG119 reviews
ENG26 reviews
ENGLISH14 reviews
ENGL13 reviews
ENG012 reviews
Show 14 more courses
ENGL22 reviews
1988ENGL11 review
B1 review
ENG18351 review
ENG18581 review
ENG40071 review
ENG41631 review
ENGL011 review
ENGL41481 review
ENGL41631 review
ENGLI11 review
ENGLI41461 review
ENGLISH21 review
ENGLISH81 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2