AI Rate Professor

Physics

Tram Dang

PHYSICS21 · ENGR12 · PHYSCS21 · ENGR1 · PHYSC21 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take her only if you already know some physics or , because .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing LecturerOff-Topic HumorTough ExamsCaring but DisorganizedLate Grading
  • some call her best at SMC, others say lectures waste time on jokes and personal stories.
  • and decide the grade.
  • She is widely described as caring and flexible on deadlines, but grading and continuity can lag.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Many As appear, but , and that it is not an easy A without physics background or heavy work.

Nearly all evidence is in person; the one .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Intro physics content is substantial, lectures often incomplete or slow, and .

Difficulty comments .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

, though a few list it as mandatory and skipping can hurt if you need lectures.

; online sample is too small to compare.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

About half would take her again; fans praise care and clarity while .

Recommendation ; the lone online review is positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Described as , yet also tagged tough grader with .

Format shift

; online has almost no grading detail.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Homework and funsies quizzes are manageable, but and inconsistent lecture coverage add real load.

Format shift

Workload comments are almost all in person.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

some call lectures refined and inspirational, others say she chats off-topic and fails to prepare students.

Format shift

Stronger praise and criticism both concentrate in in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

, but midterms and and decide the grade.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and flexible late work versus off-topic lectures, incomplete coverage, and exam difficulty that exceeds class practice.

Main concern

Exams and lecture mismatch plus disorganization can leave underprepared students stressed.

What students said

“Tram is the . All the positive reviews posted here are true.”
PHYSICS21
“One of the most disorganized classes Ive ever taken, probably covered 60% of the material, spent most of the time talking about her personal life.”
PHYSCS21
“so the ! so hard that you will get shocked and you have no idea how to study!!!”
PHYSC21

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single and hardworking for students, but .

Main concern

review.

What students said

“She is a very nice professor but . But she .”
PHYSICS21

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

curved, with limited evidence of open-book or proctoring tools.

Tough ExamsCurved SometimesQuiz From HomeworkExam Corrections Allowed

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are repeatedly called tough or and corrections.

Tough In-Person ExamsHomework-Based QuizzesCurve PossibleExam Corrections
“ so work hard.”
PHYSICS21
“the ! so hard that you will get shocked”
PHYSC21
“All in all, not easy A class.”
PHYSICS21

Online

Only one online review notes very .

Hard Exams
“She is a very nice professor but .”
PHYSICS21

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Choosing between a difficult professor and Prof. Tram? . Tram! A professors who will stay with u throughout ur education! ..”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 , and care. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“Her lectures are amazingly refined and easy to understand. Her lectures are recorded, and she even gives you her hand written notes which is amazing for reviewing.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“ .”

📝

42/100

“Her examples in class are a joke compared to what you are expected to know for her exams.”

❤️ Caring Side

70/100

“ and very outgoing. !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She always chats randomly wasting the time.
  • Lectures tend to go off-topic because the professor makes jokes
  • Her lecture is easy to understand as she provides many good examples.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • an A in her class was difficult
  • but always late graded.
  • All in all, not easy A class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very kind and caring but sometimes it feels more like speaking with a friend
  • She's sweet and wants everyone to feel comfortable and low stress
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

30 detailed reviews spanning many years with , and care raise confidence despite polarized opinions.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 56
3 out of 56
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PHYSICS2114 reviews
PHYSCS218 reviews
PHYSC214 reviews
ENGR123 reviews
ENGR11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

12

A 11 · A- 1

B range

5

B 5

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 1