AI Rate Professor

Communications

Marieke Beeler

COMST21 · COMMST35 · COM11 · COMST37 · COMST11 · COM1511 · COM35 · COMMS11 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
70.97%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take her if you will follow the rubric carefully and ; avoid if you need an .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear RubricsExtra Credit HeavyDetailed FeedbackTough On SpeechesCaring Communicator
  • , and real skill growth in speaking
  • A vocal minority call speech grading nitpicky, harsh, or AI-enforcement heavy
  • Online and in-person both work if you follow the

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

and , but speech grades can be strict and one weak speech can sink the A.

Online recent reviews are harsher on grading; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Intro communication content is accessible; public-speaking anxiety and .

Both formats describe straightforward content with speech performance as the hard part.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

Some sections stress showing up and participation, while several online and .

; in-person more often rewards or requires presence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and growth, tempered by a cluster of .

Recommendation is strong in both formats but recent online critiques lower confidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and help, yet many tough-grader reports show strict speech scoring.

Format shift

; in-person praises rubrics and EC.

Workload

Moderate

54/100

Usually a , and optional EC rather than endless busywork.

Format shift

Online winter sessions feel faster; both formats center three-ish speeches.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Students , and a caring tone when the rubric relationship works.

Format shift

Positive teaching comments appear in both formats; online also has sharp communication complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Speeches and outlines dominate the grade, with and some exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize speeches; exams described as not hard when mentioned online.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and extra-credit generous, with speeches as the main challenge.

Main concern

Harsh speech standards and participation expectations can hurt grades quickly.

What students said

“If you follow the fine.”
COMST11
“You'll be drowning in , it's impossible not to end with an A.”
COMST11
“Hypercritical on every speech and little detail she has in .”
COM11

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students often love responsiveness, rubrics, and , but recent and strict AI checks.

Main concern

and AI policies unfair to some.

What students said

“if you follow the well. The exams are not hard either.”
COM11
“ and the chance to redo recordings really helped me grow.”
COMST11
“She's a . I turned my speech in ... she gave me a 50.”
COM11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Core assessment is rubric-scored .

Speech RecordingsRubric-Based GradingExtra Credit QuizzesExams Not Hard

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment is speech and participation heavy with ; .

In-Class SpeechesClear RubricExtra Credit
“there was a and instructions what to do in order to get a good grade.”
COMST11
“All of , and you are almost guaranteed an A if you show up to class”
COM11

Online

Online grade often rests on recorded speeches with audience requirements plus exams or EC quizzes; .

Recorded SpeechesLive Audience RequiredExtra Credit QuizzesExams Not Hard
“The class grade is based on 3 speeches and 2 exams. The speeches are very straightforward, if you follow the rubric”
COM11
“ and it's an awesome way to make up for any points you may lose in an .”
COM11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you follow the fine. Thank you, professor Beeler!”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews across online and in-person sections, balancing praise for rubrics with . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Professor Beeler is a gem. She cares about your grade as much as you do.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“I would 100% recommend her online Comm1000 class.”

📋

85/100

“Loved the details she provided in the assignment description and rubrics.”

⚖️

48/100

“She is a , if you don't get everything perfectly how she imagined you won't get a good grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • always responded to my emails promptly
  • and its delightful

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • drowning in , it's impossible not to end with an A
  • and incredibly nit-picky
  • follow the well

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • incredibly caring and supportive
  • one of the
  • She's a GPT warrior!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

31 reviews with balanced online and in-person samples and recurring rubric/EC themes provide strong evidence despite recent grade-harshness outliers.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

COMST1113 reviews
COM1110 reviews
COMST213 reviews
COM15111 review
COM351 review
Show 3 more courses
COMMS111 review
COMMST351 review
COMST371 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 7 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 4