AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Nicole Woodard

COUN120 · PSYCH1 · PSYCH19 · PSYCH001 · PYSCH1 · PSYCH11 · PSYC16 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
54.05%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can self-teach from the book and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyTough graderPolarizingOpen-book optionsDisengaged online
  • life-changing for some, rude and hands-off for others
  • PSYCH1 online often feels self-taught with
  • Older in-person PSYCH19 reviews are far more positive with cheat sheets and support

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some sections feel easy open-book, but many students report and .

Online PSYCH19 easy-A comments contrast with harsh PSYCH1 online and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard intro psych but and .

; and test heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; and warn skippers fail.

; older in-person reviews emphasize showing up.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

; love her standards or hate the attitude depending on term.

; older in-person PSYCH19 skew WorthIt.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

All-or-nothing discussions and no-rounding test culture frustrate many students.

Format shift

Open-book PSYCH19 feels freer; PSYCH1 is much stricter.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Not endless homework, but and .

Format shift

Online has weekly discussions and quizzes; and .

Teaching experience

Average

40/100

Some call her inspiring and hilarious; many recent students say she is disengaged or rude.

Format shift

Online quality is clearly worse .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and strict discussion posts with few other cushions.

Format shift

Both formats test-heavy; online discussions add all-or-nothing risk.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many pre-2020 students love her support and standards; recent PSYCH1 complaints cite disengagement.

Main concern

and fast lectures with limited conceptual help.

What students said

“Professor Woodard treats the class like a source of passive income.”
PSYCH1
“She does not hand out easy A's but she is fair. She makes you want to do better”
PSYC16
“Cheat sheets, review sessions, , drops 1 quiz, she does all of the that.”
PSYCH19

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online PSYCH1 is frequently called passive-income teaching with and little engagement.

Main concern

Rude feedback, all-or-nothing posts, and .

What students said

“She's rude and .”
PSYCH1
“Basically had to in this online course.”
PSYCH1
“All quizzes and and open-notes, but the material is interesting enough to make for good reading.”
PSYCH19

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam friendliness swings hard by course and .

Open book open notes in some sectionsTest heavyAll-or-nothing discussionsCheat sheets in older sections

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and review sessions but and demanding.

Cheat sheet allowedReview sessions3 exams and multiple quizzes
“3 exams and I think like 6 quizzes and discussions”
PSYCH19
“ but she let's you bring a cheat sheet”
PSYCH19
“Grade and quizzes.”
PSYCH1

Online

Many online comments mention open-book quizzes or exams, but and anti-cheating vigilance.

Open-book optionsQuizzes and exams dominateDiscussion half-credit traps
“All quizzes and and open-notes”
PSYCH19
“She will know if youre cheating so beware”
PSYCH1
“On the or a full credit no in between.”
PSYCH1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It's an easy A, but offers no value. If you .”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, balancing recent online backlash with . Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Polarizing Quality

40/100

“Probably the .”

📘 Self-Taught Course

35/100

“Basically had to in this online course.”

🌟 Legacy Supporters

70/100

“Dr. !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She uploaded materials from
  • She is by far my most favourite teacher.
  • Just posts a and that's about it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • all the quizzes and
  • You likely won't get by with more than a B.
  • She has an .

Theme 3

💢 About Attitude

  • She's rude and condescending.
  • She will keep you in check, don't mess with her.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

37 detailed reviews with and strong internal consistency within eras.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 514

Course coverage

PSYCH119 reviews
PSYCH1910 reviews
PYSCH13 reviews
PSYCH112 reviews
COUN1201 review
Show 2 more courses
PSYC161 review
PSYCH0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 5 · A 10 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 4

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

3

D+ 1 · D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 1