AI Rate Professor

English

Tupelo Hassman

ENGL303 · ENG2 · ENG1 · ENG02 · ENGL21106 · ENG1002 · ENGLISH2 · ENGL1 · EN01 · ENG1111 · HUM26 · ENGL30 · ENG2ONL · ENGL2 · ENGLISH1 · ENG1299 · 86 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
67.65%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take her if , and and can handle inconsistency.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizingCaring MentorshipTough GraderDiscussion HeavyFlexible Deadlines
  • Students split hard between inspiring writing mentor and .
  • Workload is discussion and students.
  • Online is the main format; communication and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Many students earn A or A+ with , and revision chances, but .

Recent online sections sound more lenient; older online and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is standard English and humanities, but volume of posts, books, and .

and writing load; some newer sections feel lighter.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

Most and optional or flexible participation norms.

Online is largely asynchronous; a minority of .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and strong avoid warnings.

Recent online praise is warmer; older online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

54/100

Recent students call her lenient or revision-friendly; many older reviews still say tough and hard to please.

Format shift

Online recent reviews lean more generous; older online ENG2 reviews lean harsh.

Workload

Moderate

40/100

Discussions, essays, and in short online terms.

Format shift

Online 6-8 week sections feel heavy; some newer online sections report light weekly work.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Excellent caring feedback for supporters, for detractors.

Format shift

Polarization appears in both formats, with online volume driving most of the split.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and occasional tests rather than one big exam.

Format shift

Both formats are writing-and-discussion centered.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person and hybrid-style reviews still show the same split: and harsh critique for others.

Main concern

Heavy discussions, group projects, and .

What students said

“as long as you put the effort in its an easy A.”
ENGL2
“AVOID!!! Her online 8week class is TERRIBLE!!!”
ENG02
“Flexible deadlines, she is enthusiastic and quite possibly the .”
HUM26

Remote format

Online

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online English and humanities are discussion and but uneven on clarity and .

Main concern

, and feedback that some call harsh or agenda-driven.

What students said

“she doesn't give much work and if you turn in work late!”
ENG1
“This is by far the ever taken in my entire life.”
HUM26
“Constantly extended deadlines to give us more time, and is very up to date.”
ENGL2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly writing and discussion based; reviews do not clearly prove strict proctored exams.

EssaysWeekly DiscussionsGroup ProjectsOccasional TestsRevision Opportunities

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and group projects more than proctored testing.

DiscussionsEssaysGroup ProjectsTough Grading
“ , and tests.”
ENG2
“About 15 posts a week. Also have to read 3 books and write 4 essays.”
ENGLISH2

Online

Online grades center on discussions, essays, group projects, and delayed but .

DiscussionsEssaysGroup ProjectsFlexible Deadlines
“we read one novel, wrote three papers, and .”
ENG2
“The week's work probably took me anywhere from 15-30 minutes.”
ENGL1
“Be prepared to put in a lot of and discussion boards.”
ENG02

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Hassman is the most caring and understanding professor I've ever had.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 English and humanities reviews across mostly online formats. Credibility rating: High.

❤️

58/100

“ .”

⚡ Polarizing Experience

66/100

“I honestly don't understand the negative reviews for Hassman at all.”

📝 Writing Workload

40/100

“A LOT of reading and A LOT of writing.”

⏳ Flexibility

78/100

“Constantly extended deadlines to give us more time”

Theme 1

✍️ About Teaching and Feedback

  • offers excellent criticisms
  • , so helpful

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Difficulty

  • as long as you put the effort in its an easy A

Theme 3

💬 About Work Format

  • weekly discussions
  • group projects
  • and too much work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

86

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years with rich detail; opinions conflict but patterns are stable.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 543
4 out of 510
3 out of 510
2 out of 511
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ENG29 reviews
ENG028 reviews
ENGLISH26 reviews
ENGL14 reviews
ENG13 reviews
Show 12 more courses
ENGL23 reviews
HUM263 reviews
EN012 reviews
ENG10022 reviews
ENGL302 reviews
ENGLISH12 reviews
33131 review
ENG11111 review
ENG12991 review
ENG2ONL1 review
ENGL211061 review
ENGL3031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

34 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 10 · A 12 · A- 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 1