AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Sanja Morris

PHILOS3228 · PHILOS1 · PHILO5 · PHILOS7 · PHILO7 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
37.04%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you need an easy A for GPA; if you can match her argument style and accept strict writing grades.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderSubjective Writing MarksGPA RiskTest HeavyLight Weekly Work
  • Weekly discussions and quizzes are manageable, but writing and and subjectively.
  • Many students say the class is easy to pass yet hard to protect a high GPA.
  • Tone toward students is mixed, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Passing is realistic, but an A is hard because writing and .

Online and in-person both warn about tough writing and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Core content and weekly tasks and subjective tests raise the challenge.

; in-person content is often called basic but boring.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

70/100

as not mandatory, especially online asynchronous courses.

; in-person is mixed but often flexible.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Take-again sits near thirty-seven percent, driven by GPA risk and .

Some ; recent in-person tone is harsher.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and GPA-ruin warnings dominate, with her view.

Format shift

Both formats report picky writing grades; .

Workload

Light

64/100

Weekly load is usually one discussion and two big exams or papers.

Format shift

Online weekly work is light; .

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

and accessibility, but many call her unclear, passive-aggressive, or .

Format shift

Online quality is split; recent in-person comments lean more negative on tone.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Two major tests or writing exams usually outweigh weekly posts, so .

Format shift

Online and in-person both describe graded-by-few-things structures.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews stress biased or , and GPA damage despite sometimes interesting content.

Main concern

Students say she docks for arguments that disagree with her view and .

What students said

“If you have a 4.0 and want your GPA ruined she will do that for you.”
PHILO5
“she checks if midterm!!”
PHILO5
“found her to be passive aggresive in her announcements and quite rude.”
PHILO7

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Asynchronous online courses have light weekly posts and no textbook, but , and and self-taught.

Main concern

Little live contact plus subjective test and .

What students said

“It's an asynchronous class so you'll never speak with her or see her. In return, it's your responsibility to read and study for everything!”
PHILO5
“ incredibly unhelpful since it is asynchronous and .”
PHILO5
“This class is easy to pass but if you like having a good GPA.”
PHILOS1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and written portions are graded strictly and subjectively; .

Writing-Heavy ExamsSubjective AnswersCanvas Monitoring MentionedTough on Essays

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and students say wrong or right answers are not shown after exams.

Canvas Tab MonitoringNo Answer ReviewPicky Writing
“she checks if midterm!!”
PHILO5
“In the got wrong or right”
PHILO5

Online

Online exams and written portions are called unclear or opinion-based, with .

Test HeavySubjective Written PortionsLittle Feedback
“Your grade is also a majority based on two tests, so if you do perfect in but get anything other than an A on the Midterm and .”
PHILO5
“ . This class is easy to pass but if you like having a good GPA.”
PHILOS1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nothing personal, but if you want to ruin your perfect gpa. Lol.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting grading strictness, GPA risk, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

22/100

“She is an and if your argument is not in line with her own opinion.”

📉 GPA Risk

32/100

“This class is easy to pass but if you like having a good GPA.”

📚 Weekly Load Light

64/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📈 About Grades

  • will ruin your GPA
  • Can earn A! Be careful! Don't cheat.

Theme 2

💻 About Online Structure

  • asynchronous class so you'll never speak with her
  • No required textbook, all content online

Theme 3

🗣️ About Tone

  • passive aggresive in her announcements and quite rude
  • can come off as somewhat passive in her emails
  • Really kind and understanding. Just do the work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

27 reviews across online and and GPA risk from 2019-2025.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 57
1 out of 57

Course coverage

PHILO514 reviews
PHILOS16 reviews
PHILOS73 reviews
PHILO72 reviews
PHILOS32282 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

12

B+ 5 · B 7

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4