AI Rate Professor

Economics

Jason Gurtovoy

ECON1 · ECON2 · ECON3618 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

; every review frames the class as unsupported busywork.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-Taught CourseNo FeedbackConnect OverloadUnresponsiveAvoid
  • All six reviews give quality 1; students say you and Connect.
  • Assignments and , and grades are posted late or randomly.
  • Almost no communication or and the one in-person report.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and opaque grades make an A feel uncertain even when effort is high.

Online reviews dominate; the one and grades random.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Compressed reading, lengthy Connect sets, and .

Both formats describe heavy hard work; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

and the course is treated as self-paced material dumps.

Online reviews imply no live presence; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Every quality score is 1 and comments say .

Unanimous negative tone across online and the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students report random grades, missing gradebook entries, and .

Format shift

Harsh or and in-person comments.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

and discussions create constant overload.

Format shift

Workload complaints are strongest online; and long.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

No real , and emails ignored for a week or more.

Format shift

Online reviews detail absent instruction; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

are long and poorly worded.

Format shift

Online comments emphasize Connect tests; as well.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person ECON2 review calls assignments and tests hard and grades random.

Main concern

Hard .

What students said

“Assignments Is So Hard And ”
ECON2

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ECON sections rely on copied lectures, long Connect work, and near-zero instructor presence.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“You really have to teach yourself the class.”
ECON1
“ !”
ECON2
“He drowns us in assignments and homework and goes awol.”
ECON3618

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and figure/table mix-ups; not described as open-book.

Poorly Worded TestsConnect ExamsHeavy Reading

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and long without proctoring details.

Hard Long Tests
“Assignments Is So Hard And ”
ECON2

Online

, and criticized for wording errors that waste test time.

Connect TestsPoor WordingSlideshow Self-Study
“ " when he meant "table"”
ECON1
“Test and chapter.”
ECON2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Avoid!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (5 online, 1 in person), all quality-1, focused on self-teaching and overload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

12/100

“ and .”

📖 Teach Yourself Econ

10/100

“You really have to teach yourself the class.”

📚 Workload Dump

18/100

“He drowns us in assignments and homework and goes awol.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the only aid provided outside of the textbook were mcgraw-hill slideshows
  • It seems as if he just put all the material out for the students and let them figure it out
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • some of grades are random
  • He puts none of the grades in so you have no idea how youre doing
  • Takes forever to put in grades

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only six all-1 ratings spanning 2019-2025; sample is small but opinions are perfectly consistent.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ECON23 reviews
ECON12 reviews
ECON36181 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1