AI Rate Professor

Philosophy & Social Sciences

Eileen Rabach

ECON1 · HIST15ECON15 · ECON5 · POLISCI5 · GLOBALST5 · ECON05 · ECON15 · GLOBAL5 · POLSC5 · ECON15ANDIPE · ECONOMY15 · HISTORY15 · HIST15 · POLISCI5IPE · 207 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
55.93%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a rigorous, idea-rich social science course and will read hard; if you need an easy GE or highly polished structure.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInspirational LecturesTest HeavyHeavy ReadingTough GraderLife-Changing for Engaged Students
  • Lectures are widely called memorable, passionate, and world-expanding if .
  • Grades rest mostly on a ; slackers and GE-seekers often struggle or drop.
  • Organization and toughness are the main complaints, not lack of knowledge.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

As are possible but only with heavy reading, note-taking, and cushions.

All analyzed evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content spans dense political economy and history themes with lots of reading and .

All analyzed evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory, and skip-class tags warn you will not pass without lectures.

All analyzed evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

devoted students call her a gem, while others urge avoidance for organization and grade risk.

All analyzed evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

36/100

, and few grade cushions make high marks hard even for strong students.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Expect , and exam prep that dominate the semester.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Many call lectures amazing and inspirational, though disorganization and occasional harshness undercut consistency.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades are driven by a assignment buffer.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students describe passionate, dense lectures with , and high payoff for serious learners, plus frequent notes about disorganization and .

Main concern

Unorganized pacing and if .

What students said

“She's not for the faint of heart looking for an easy ride. . But and thought.”
ECON15ANDIPE
“This is a very HARD class, that being said she is remarkable. if you want to lean in and really learn.”
ECON5
“The and . Most of the class dropped after the first test.”
POLSC5

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are mostly high-stakes exams with tricky multiple choice and written work; .

Multiple Choice ExamsFree ResponseTake-Home Essay FinalTest HeavyTricky Questions

Assessment risk

Strict

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments describe three large exams, tricky MC items, harsh written grading, and .

3 Large ExamsTricky Multiple ChoiceTake-Home EssayPop Quiz
“You are only take 3 exams, all multiple choice questions some pretty tricky, one extended response with the .”
ECON15
“(3) 100 Question Exams (2) Group Projects (1) Final .”
POLISCI5IPE

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Rabach is A GEM! Lectures have memorable examples, stats, and great info... the . There is some info on the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, highlighting inspirational rigor versus organization and grade risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Lecture Quality

74/100

“She encourages critical thinking within a larger framework and longer timeline... Very inspirational speaker and professor.”

📚 Workload & Reading

28/100

“READ AND REREAD. REREAD and UNDERSTAND THE READING AND LECTURES because the .”

⚖️ Grade Difficulty

34/100

“I am a straight-A student and get ready for ... no matter how hard I work, I will never get an A.”

👍 Recommendation Split

56/100

“the ... you will definitely get an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing teacher. She was my inspiration to get my degree in economics.
  • Lectures are a mess and it is hard to know how much of what she is saying is relavant
  • her lectures are amazing though

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • . But and thought
  • Graded by few things
  • An A is attainable just work!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she was accommodating and empathetic for my family situation
  • GENUINELY NOT A KIND PERSON AND VERY CONDESCENDING
  • Super sweet professor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

207

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed in-person reviews across many years with strong thematic consistency on rigor, lectures, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 589
4 out of 553
3 out of 525
2 out of 515
1 out of 525

Course coverage

ECON0512 reviews
ECON158 reviews
ECON58 reviews
GLOBALST55 reviews
POLSC55 reviews
Show 9 more courses
POLISCI53 reviews
POLISCI5IPE2 reviews
ECON11 review
ECON15ANDIPE1 review
ECONOMY151 review
GLOBAL51 review
HIST151 review
HIST15ECON151 review
HISTORY151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 5 · A 15 · A- 4

B range

7

B+ 1 · B 6

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 5